Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation
is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they
want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything
more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and
see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation.
It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what
they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in
their weapons, but will know that you did.
Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.
Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the
short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban
list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had
no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a
framework for the new list the Brady’s plan to introduce shortly. I have
an outline of the Brady’s current plans and targets of opportunity.
It’s horrific. They’re going after the courts, regulatory agencies,
firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the
people. They’ve made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever,
attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact
our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated
property, states’ rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in
addition to the Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list
proposal (final list will be worse):
Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
M1 Carbine,
Sturm Ruger Mini-14,
AR-15,
Bushmaster XM15,
Armalite M15,
AR-10,
Thompson 1927,
Thompson M1;
AK,
AKM,
AKS,
AK-47,
AK-74,
ARM,
MAK90,
NHM 90,
NHM 91,
SA 85,
SA 93,
VEPR;
Olympic Arms PCR;
AR70,
Calico Liberty ,
Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU, Fabrique National FN/FAL,
FN/LAR, or FNC, Hi-Point20Carbine, HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, HK-PSG-1,
Thompson 1927 Commando, Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; Saiga, SAR-8, SAR-4800, SKS
with detachable magazine, SLG 95, SLR 95 or 96, Steyr AU, Tavor, Uzi,
Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).
Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
Calico M-110,
MAC-10,
MAC-11, or MPA3,
Olympic Arms OA,
TEC-9,
TEC-DC9,
TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10,
Uzi.
Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
Armscor 30 BG,
SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
Striker 12,
Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below),
(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.
Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than
10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).
A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has:
(i) a second pistol grip,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a barrel shroud or
(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and
(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
A semiautomatic shotgun with:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and
(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.
Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the
proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any “semiautomatic rifle or
shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a
firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly
suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.”
Note that Obama’s pick for this office, Eric Holder, wrote a brief in
the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a
working firearm in your own home. In making this determination, the
bill says, “there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm
procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement
agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and shall not
be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely
because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.” In plain
English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or
the military is not suitable for the public.
The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn’t
have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose
— is that devious or what? And of course, “sporting purpose” is a
rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support
whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear
arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.
Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America
http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm
Forward or send to every gun owner you know…
Watch This, If You Want More Proof:
YouTube – CNN- Obama To BAN Guns SPREAD THIS FOLKS, PLZ!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv3p2lLmjGk
A partial list of gun rights groups:
Gun Owners of America
http://gunowners.org/
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
http://www.jpfo.org/
FREEDOM=GUNS
http://www.tcsn.net/doncicci/freedom.htm
National Rifle Association
http://www.nra.org/
Second Amendment Committee
http://www.libertygunrights.com/
Second Amendment Foundation
http://www.saf.org/
Second Amendment Sisters
http://www.2asisters.org/
Women Against Gun Control
http://www.wagc.com/
