| Chuck -- I come into this election with clear eyes. I am proud of all we have achieved together, but I am mindful of all that remains to be done. I know some out there are frustrated by the pace of our progress. I want you to know I'm frustrated, too. But with so much riding on the outcome of this election, I need everyone to get in this game. Neither one of us is here because we thought it would be easy. Making change is hard. It's what we've said from the beginning. And we've got the lumps to show for it. The fight this fall is as critical as any this movement has taken on together. And if we are serious about change, we need to fight as hard as we ever have. The very special interests who have stood in the way of change at every turn want to put their conservative allies in control of Congress. And they're doing it with the help of billionaires and corporate special interests underwriting shadowy campaign ads. If they succeed, they will not stop at making our work more difficult -- they will do their best to undo what you and I fought so hard to achieve. There is no better time for you to start fighting back -- a fellow grassroots supporter has promised to match, dollar for dollar, whatever you can chip in today. I know that sometimes it feels like we've come a long way from the hope and excitement of the inauguration, with its "Hope" posters and historic crowds on the National Mall. I will never forget it. But it was never why we picked up this fight. I didn't run for president because I wanted to do what would make me popular. And you didn't help elect me so I could read the polls and calculate how to keep myself in office. You and I are in this because we believe in a simple idea -- that each and every one of us, working together, has the power to move this country forward. We believed that this was the moment to solve the challenges that the country had ignored for far too long. That change happens only from the bottom up. That change happens only because of you. So I need you to fight for it over the next 26 days. I need your time. I need your commitment. And I need your help to get your friends and neighbors involved. If you bring in a new donor today, your $3 donation will become $6. And our Vote 2010 campaign will have twice the resources to make important investments like putting staff on the ground, providing materials for volunteers, and turning out millions of voters come Election Day. Please donate $3 or more today -- and renew your commitment: If we meet this test -- if you, like me, believe that change is not a spectator sport -- we will not just win this election. In the years that come, we can realize the change we are seeking -- and reclaim the American dream for this generation. Thank you for being a part of it, President Barack Obama | |
Paid for and authorized by the Democratic National Committee, www.democrats.org. This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. Democratic National Committee, 430 S. Capitol St. SE, Washington, DC 20003 Contributions or gifts to the Democratic National Committee are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. Click here to unsubscribe from this mailing list. ++++++++++++++++++++++ |
Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Getting desperate?
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Islam - religion of peace and tolerance
http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplayer/cbnplayer.swf?aid=17933
Scary.
H/t BMEWS
Monday, October 4, 2010
More letters to the editor
'Steady decline of middle class'
If he had followed history over the last three decades, it would be obvious that not taxing the rich does not work. While America has the highest corporate tax rate in the industrialized world, less than one in four corporations pay a dime in taxes. This is self-destructive for the vast majority of American businesses.
Taxes pay for roads and highways used by businesses to deliver their products to the marketplace. Taxes pay for public education that supplies an educated workforce to provide labor for businesses to develop, manufacture, improve, market and sell their products. Taxes provide police and fire protection to protect the factories, vehicles and sales distribution points necessary to business success. Obviously, no business wants government until their building catches fire and they start looking for the fire truck!
Since 1980, when Reagan began the process of reducing taxes on the superrich, we have seen a steady rise of unemployment, ballooning of the national debt, loss of family wage jobs, rise in health care costs, rising national poverty rates and bankruptcies and a decline in public education effectiveness. Oh, let’s not forget that Reagan, with the help of a little-known economist named Alan Greenspan, was the first to begin robbing the Social Security trust fund to help hide his out-of-control deficits.
During this time we have seen the steady decline of the middle class and its buying power. Since we are a consumer economy, where 2/3 of our economy is driven by consumer spending, it doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure out what is going wrong in today’s economy.
Rick Brunton
Beloit
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
My reply - let's see if I get published:
Wow - this is getting interesting. I recently replied to George Ferriter about raising federal taxes, and now Rick Brunton has joined in.
I think if Mr. Brunton does a little research, he will find that President Reagan and Alan Greenspan were not the guys who changed the accounting for the Social Security trust fund. This was done by an earlier administration - Lyndon Johnson in 1968 - cited by the federal Social Security Administration. http://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html
What began in 1984 under Reagan was taxation of Social Security benefits.
I agree - some taxation is necessary to run the Constitutionally-authorized functions of the federal government. However, when the federal government continually votes to increase spending on programs that they have no Constitutional authority to create, these taxes start to degrade, rather than enhance, our country's financial health.
If some large firms escape paying taxes, would not the proper response be to modify the tax code to close the loopholes they are using, rather than increase taxes on everyone?
Furthermore, it is shown that the top 10% of US taxpayers pay over 70% of all federal income taxes, while the bottom 90% pay 30%. The bottom 50% of US taxpayers pay just under 3%. http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
The steady decline of the middle class and loss of jobs graphed with the increase of federal rules and spending makes an interesting inverse relationship. Government spending never created one job that did not cost the "rich" a lot more than that job created in a healthy economy would have.
We need to rein in big government.
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Saturday, October 2, 2010
The Church of Climate Disruption has a message
YouTube originally had this labeled "private", but it's back up for the time being.
The radical environmentalists are more dangerous than any "climate change" could ever be.
Friday, October 1, 2010
Want to help the Demonrats?
September 17, 2010
How YOU can help make the Democrats’ new toilet logo into as big of a disaster for them as possible
Posted by hillbuzz under Uncategorized | Tags: How to cost the DNC money, New Democrat toilet logo sucks, What to do with solicitations from the DNC |[63] Comments
First off, you should check out this thread over at Democrats.org. We got a comment in there very early, and it seems to have set off a lot of the whackadoodles. It’s always a good thing to get these loons revved up. Raising their blood pressure is beneficial to everyone. Good thing they all have free Obamacare now, right?
+++++++++++++++

Shamelessly stolen from Hillbuzz
Remember the open-carry arrests in Madison?
Things have escalated - a federal lawsuit has been filed.
Interesting times.
"Climate Disruption", explained
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Borepatch 101: Global Warming
Oooooh kaaaaay. Nice Marketing Spin.
I wasn't trained as a scientist, but I was trained as an engineer (Electrical, thanks for asking!), and while that's not exactly the same thing, it left me very well versed in the Scientific Method. More importantly (from a
So yeah, you can count me as one of those "skeptics".
Go read the whole thing
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Gun bans STILL don't work
Why Gun Bans Still Don't Work
By John Lott
Published September 29, 2010
| FoxNews.com
- Share
- Comments (45)
- Text Size
Yesterday's wild shooting spree at the University of Texas fortunately ended without anyone being hurt before the gunman shot himself. Naturally, the incident has yet again raised the question over gun bans, such as the ban currently in effect at the University of Texas.
Do they actually do more harm than good?
Gun bans as the solution to gun violence has popped up again, covering different areas. It would have been nice if such bans had stopped criminals from using guns. But, alas, the results are invariably the same, whether the ban is put in place for college campuses, cities, or entire nations: gun bans disarm the law-abiding, not criminals. Instead of making victims safer, they make criminals safer.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Monday, September 27, 2010
More Internet censorship?
By: Jim Meyers
Sen. Patrick Leahy has introduced a bill affecting the Internet that could have a “dangerous impact on freedom of speech,” according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) introduced by the Vermont Democrat, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, requires Internet Service Providers, Domain Name System providers, and others to block Internet users from reaching certain websites.The legislation, which seeks to curb online piracy and the sale of counterfeit goods, would create two “blacklists.” The first is a list of all websites hit with a censorship court order from the Attorney General. The second is a list of domain names that the Department of Justice determines are “dedicated to infringing activities” that violate copyright laws.
COICA requires blocking for domains on the first list and “strongly suggests” that domains on the second list should be blocked as well by providing legal immunity for those who do block access to websites, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a nonprofit civil liberties organization.
“This is a censorship bill that runs roughshod over freedom of speech on the Internet” and could have a “dangerous impact on freedom of speech,” the EFF observes.
H/t Alphecca
Well, since everyone else has done it...
This babe (?) asks 20 questions about "gun control".
1. Do you believe that criminals and domestic abusers should be able to buy guns without background checks?
Well, in a word, yes. You see, there's this little piece of paper - the US Constitution - that states, in no uncertain terms, that "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". What part of that don't you understand?
Criminals and domestic abusers do not magically lose their Constitutional rights until convicted in a court of law and sentenced to prison. When they are released, they are assumed to have "paid their debt to society" and are allowed to rejoin the rest of America as free citizens again.
You may not like this, but that's just too bad.
2. What is your proposal for keeping guns away from criminals, domestic abusers, terrorists and dangerously mentally ill people?
Simple - we don't try. The bad guys will always find a way to get what they want. Every attempt at governmental banning of substances or objects or writings has failed miserably - our latest effort - the "war on drugs" only costs us billions of dollars every year and keeps no one from getting high. Why should we waste money on bans that don't work?
Better we allow everyone who wishes to own and carry a weapon the freedom to do so - see answer #1 - and trust the good will overwhelm the bad. Every private firearm held by a good person out there is a potential to stop the actions of a criminal or terrorist.
3. Do you believe that a background check infringes on your constitutional right to "keep and bear arms"?
Definitely.
4. Do you believe that I and people with whom I work intend to ban your guns?
Definitely. Some of your people have baldy stated this a number of times.
5. If yes to #4, how do you think that could happen ( I mean the physical action)?
1934 National Firearms Act
1968 Gun Control Act
1986 Firearm Owner's Protection Act
Clinton assault weapons ban
Katrina gun confiscation
And so on..
6. What do you think are the "second amendment remedies" that the tea party GOP candidate for Senate in Nevada( Sharron Angle) has proposed?
If the government does not respond to the legitimate grievances of the People, they may become necessary. Remember the American Revolution? The Declaration of Independence?
Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
7. Do you believe in the notion that if you don't like what someone is doing or saying, second amendment remedies should be applied?
If their actions directly offer harm to me and mine, certainly. Their speech is protected under that same pesky Constitution, unless they offer slander or libel, and that's why we have courts of law.
8. Do you believe it is O.K. to call people with whom you disagree liars and demeaning names?
Liars, yes, if that's what they are. Names, no. This just makes things worse, and makes thinking people imagine the person so responding is of lesser intelligence or maturity.
9. If yes to #8, would you do it in a public place to the person's face?
If it came to that, I certainly would. I'm not a coward, as many who hold opinions counter to mine have demonstrated.
10. Do you believe that any gun law will take away your constitutional rights?
No, I don't THINK so. The Constitution overrides all un-Constitutional laws.
11. Do you believe in current gun laws? Do you think they are being enforced? If not, explain.
Two part question. Trouble counting there?
First, what has belief got to do with whether there are laws currently on the books? If you mean do I believe they are useful or legal, no, I do not THINK they are either.
Second, yes, I know of several places where such illegal laws are being enforced against the wrong people.
12. Do you believe that all law-abiding citizens are careful with their guns and would never shoot anybody?
Another double question.
First, "all law-abiding citizens" includes a subset of idiots, imbeciles, and plain stupid people, not to mention the accident-prone and clumsy. These people need to take responsibility for their actions or omissions.
Second, if you would never shoot anybody, what's the use of having a gun for self-defense? If you want to protect yourself from an attack, you have to be willing to apply suitable force to prevent the attacker from succeeding.
13. Do you believe that people who commit suicide with a gun should be included in the gun statistics?
"Figures lie and liars figure". I do not see how suicides are anyone's business outside the family, if any, of the person committing same, until they involve innocent bystanders.
Statistics have been bandied about by both sides. I can cite several studies that show more guns equates to less crime - look up John Lott some time.
14. Do you believe that accidental gun deaths should "count" in the total numbers?
See #13.
15. Do you believe that sometimes guns, in careless use or an accident, can shoot a bullet without the owner or holder of the gun pulling the trigger?
In some extremely rare circumstances, usually coupled with a careless or foolhardy act or omission on the part of the owner or holder, yes. Does this have any bearing on MY right to self defense? No.
16. Do you believe that 30,000 gun deaths a year is too many?
Another question of statistics and faith. If you lump all deaths involving even peripherally, a firearm, you get that number. If you look at true accidents, you get a much lower number.
Once you get a realistic number of accidental shootings, you need to compare them to other accidental causes of death. The numbers put "gun deaths" way down on the list.
Risk of death during life is unavoidable. Perfect safety is a mirage. People who believe in perfect safety also tend to believe in the Tooth Fairy and that we can spend our way out of national bankruptcy.
17. How will you help to prevent more shootings in this country?
I won't try to prevent "more". Truly justifiable shootings - I have no interest in decreasing these - in fact, I would like to see this number rise. It would be an indicator that the general public is at last fed up with crime and is taking back their right to do something about it.
Accidental shootings - I advocate gun safety education be mandatory in grade school - something like the NRA's "Eddie Eagle" at first, moving up to marksmanship and practical shooting in higher grades, with Olympic-style shooting sports offered in schools for those who desire to participate.
18. Do you believe the articles that I have posted about actual shootings or do you think I am making them up or that human interest stories about events that have happened should not count when I blog about gun injuries and deaths?
I have no idea - I don't frequent your blog. As for the mainstream media, I firmly believe that they tend to cherry-pick stories that support their agenda - and that stories of successful self-defense do not do so.
Do I know that some of your compatriots lie and misquote? Yes.
19. There has been some discussion of the role of the ATF here. Do you believe the ATF wants your guns and wants to harass you personally? If so, provide examples ( some have written a few that need to be further examined).
No. The small interactions I have had with the ATF have been good.
Do I think the ATF needs more oversight and should be investigated? Definitely yes.
20. Will you continue a reasonable discussion towards an end that might lead somewhere or is this an exercise in futility?
I will continue to work towards the repeal of all un-Constitutional laws, whatever their subject. Will I compromise with your people? Never.
Economics 101
The fact is, this is a spending problem. If you confiscated every single penny from every billionaire in America, you couldn't fix the deficit. According to this link, if you confiscated every single penny of income from the top 1% of taxpayers, you couldn't pay off this year's deficit. In fact, the top brackets pay a higher percentage of the tax burden than ever before:
Never forget that while it's not a fundamental characteristic of the universe and is not a physical law, Hauser's Law always seems to be true. If that bothers you, the laws of thermodynamics aren't fundamental physical laws, either. Hauser's Law and the First Law of Thermodynamics enjoy essentially the same status.
Go read the whole thing.
Obama looking to apply some whoop-ass?
Obama Looking For A** To Kick Over Exploding Deficit, Out Of Control Spending
Only days after President Obama sought out “ass to kick” in the wake of the British Petroleum oil spill, he continued to unleash his fury, this time at those responsible for America’s spiraling debt and out of control spending.
“I have a message for the people who have been spending your tax dollars like drunken sailors: there’s a 50-gallon drum of whoop-ass waiting at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,” said Obama, “and I’m gonna be doling out force-fed tap hits from here on out. The Chairman of BP, Rush Limbaugh, hell, Chuck Norris too. Anybody wants a piece of this, I’m right here, baby.”"
+++++++++++
He may need one of these: Ass-kicking machine - and someone to operate it while he "bows" in front of it...
Friday, September 24, 2010
OsamaCare revealed
Examiner Editorial: Obamacare is even worse than critics thought
Examiner Editorial
September 22, 2010
|
| Much more has been revealed about Obamacare since President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pushed the bill on Americans six months ago. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP file) |
Six months ago, President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rammed Obamacare down the throats of an unwilling American public. Half a year removed from the unprecedented legislative chicanery and backroom dealing that characterized the bill's passage, we know much more about the bill than we did then. A few of the revelations:
» Obamacare won't decrease health care costs for the government. According to Medicare's actuary, it will increase costs. The same is likely to happen for privately funded health care.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obamacare-is-even-worse-than-critics-thought-960772-103571664.html#ixzz10RmzmnD4
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Another test case?
Police cite 'open carry' gunholders with disorderly conduct, chief clarifies policy
H/t AlpheccaDISCLOSE raises its' head yet again
Vote NO on DISCLOSE. If you want even a PRAYER or re-election next month, vote NO.
In fact, vote NO if for no other reason that you will leave office retaining some of your honor as a citizen, rather than being branded a traitor to the nation if you vote YES.
McCain-Feingold was bad enough - here you have a small way to reclaim respect in the eyes of the people you have supposedly been representing.
Emailed Kohl this:
Vote NO on DISCLOSE. You owe it to the people you supposedly represent to prevent this blatant infringement of free speech from becoming yet another un-Constitutional law.
For whatever good it may do. Will call again - and again.
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Sunday, September 19, 2010
It's official
Obama Russian Caps

How the Red Chinese see Teh One

Seen at Roberta X's place
Saturday, September 18, 2010
From back in Illinois
Dem Congresswoman’s Supporters Participate in ‘Palin-As-Hitler’ Rally
by Larry O'ConnorA video showing protesters outside an Americans For Prosperity event has surfaced on the internet. It shows the protestors with signs depicting Sarah Palin and Glenn beck with Hitler mustaches and the label “Naz-Tea Party” over their pictures. Also depicted as Hitler is GOP candidate Adam Kinzinger running against Rep. Debbie Halvorson (IL-D) in the 11th District in Illinois.
As protests go, it’s a bit limp and poorly attended, but the offensive and inflammatory signs certainly grab your attention. Especially considering the Democratic Party and the NAACP’s very high-profile condemnation of inflammatory signs that have appeared at Tea Party events.
What makes this video so compelling is what it shows after the protest.Read the rest...
Why I won't be burning Korans
Even if I could afford to buy some, I would not - simply to prevent any of my money going to support Islam in any way i could avoid.
A potent picture
Scan through the picture slowly and read the captions - and the detail on the right side.
Chilling.
Friday, September 17, 2010
Another letter to the editor
Tax wealthy, reduce deficit
The nation bears a burden of gigantic problems, affecting every aspect of our society and political system. Irrespective of where one might stand on any aspect of this crisis, we should all agree that the ill-considered temporary tax cuts for the wealthy - put together as an economic stimulus early in the Bush Administration - be allowed to expire. The reduced taxes for the already strapped and financially damaged middle class should be extended.
Other parts of the Bush Tax cuts must be allowed to expire. When one is deeply in debt, increasing one’s income is sensible. Debts are due. The small numbers of citizens who have benefited in far greater magnitude than the vast majority by the temporary tax reductions should step up and pay their dues. The wealthy benefited in greater proportion from the temporary cuts, and now should bear a proportional increase via the restoration of the previously established tax rates.
That this will have grave negative impact on the greater economy is nonsense - with the cuts in place, the economy still imploded. Taxing the wealthy quite possibly will do the economy some good, if used to reduce the deficit.
George Ferriter
Beloit
My response - we'll see if it gets printed.
In response to Mr. Ferriter's letter of September 17th:
It should be obvious to anyone who follows recent history and understands what has been happening in our federal and state governments for the last few decades, that "taxing the rich" never works, and ends up taxing everyone.
Look at the recent government bailouts of banks and other firms "too big to fail". The American people were saddled with trillions in debt, debt that will be paid, if ever, by our grandkid's grandkids. This money ended up being paid by the millions to the people in charge of those banks and firms.
The recent "health care reform" bill, crammed through Congress in the wee hours without being read by anyone, will pay billions to select organizations and to government bureaucrats, while again saddling the common folk with immense debt.
The "wealthy" that will end up paying these taxes will be the family owned small business with 25 employees or the family farm which will have to be sold rather than passed on to the next generation because of the evil "death tax", and again, the common folk. If you tax a corporation, they just raise the price of the commodity they sell to us - so if you want to pay more, let's end those tax reductions. I'm sure the government can find a way to waste the extra money.
Or - we could insist that our public servants work for US, rather than foisting ever more grandiose schemes on a long-suffering America.
Chuck
Thursday, September 16, 2010
We are screwed!

IMAO has the right idea:
They Make it Too Easy
The Democrats unveiled their fancy new logo today:

Didn’t take long for me to figure out what it looked like:

Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Climate change? We dunno...
Pachauri admits the IPCC just guesses the numbers

Such is the pressure finally beginning to bear on the IPCC that Pachauri has been forced into the ridiculous position of trying to rescue credibility by contradicting most of their past PR campaign. He’s taken the extraordinary step of admitting they don’t have hard numbers, hey, but it’s all OK because the IPCC is really a government agency to make policy, not to write scientific reports “that don’t see the light of day”.
So he’s admitting that the IPCC was all about policy prescriptions all along? And the science was just fudged-up window dressing to provide an excuse? Well, who would have guessed.
Hidden beside Pachauri’s declaration that he’s happy about the IAC report, he let slip a corker of a line:
Times of India asks: Anything in the UN probe report you completely or partly disagree with?
So if you can’t quantify uncertainties (like is climate sensitivity say 0.5 degrees or 6.5 degrees, and with what probabilities) just go with your best guess, call it expert opinion (especially if you only pick and pay the “right” experts) and say that there is a 90% certainty, even if there are no numbers you can add up to get that.They have talked about quantifying uncertainties. To some extent, we are doing that, though not perfectly. But the issue is that in some cases, you really don’t have a quantitative base by which you can attach a probability or a level of uncertainty that defines things in quantitative terms. And there, let’s not take away the importance of expert judgment. And that is something the report has missed or at least not pointed out.
At JoNova. Go read the whole thing.
War on salt?
Next, Michelle Obama's health reform plan for the nation's restaurant menus and families dining out
First Lady Michelle Obama, who has been unable to convince the Smoker-in-Chief to give up that dreadful habit, now has some health suggestions for other American families and for restaurant menus across the country. The goal is to eat healthier, although that might hurt restaurant sales and cause disappointed children.
Damn, she take a good picture!
Monday, September 13, 2010
Call a spade a spade?
British Teenager Banned From US For Life: Called Barack a “Prick”
If we can't call him what we think he is, what's left for us?
UPDATE: A trainwreck in Maxwell says what I was thinking, but neglected to state.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Thoughts on "radical Islam"
We ought to call these people "fundamentalist Muslims" - after all, we call those who interpret the Bible literally "fundamentalist Christians".
When the mainstream of Islam publicly disavows the passages in the Koran that direct Muslims to wage jihad on everyone not one of them, and demonstrate by their action that they do not support such actions, I will consider Islam to be a religion of peace, as peace is defined by the majority of non-Muslims.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
UN == One world government
United Nations
EXCLUSIVE: After a Year of Setbacks, U.N. Looks to Take Charge of World's Agenda
By George Russell
Published September 08, 2010
FoxNews.com
After a year of humiliating setbacks, United Nations Secretary General Ban ki-Moon and about 60 of his top lieutenants — the top brass of the entire U.N. system — spent their Labor Day weekend at a remote Austrian Alpine retreat, discussing ways to put their sprawling organization in charge of the world’s agenda.
Go read the whole thing.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
I lived to see the day!

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley pauses as he speaks during a news conference, Thursday, July 1, 2010 in Chicago. (AP)
From Fox News:
Chicago Mayor Daley Opts Against Re-Election, Opens Door for Rahm Campaign
Published September 07, 2010
Longtime Chicago Mayor Richard Daley announced Tuesday that he will not seek re-election, a stunning decision that apparently ends a political dynasty that dominated the city for more than a half century and paves the way for Rahm Emanuel to chase his dream job.
Whoo-hoo!
Chuck
Monday, September 6, 2010
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Too good to pass up
I've been a fan of "reverend" Jesse Jackson for years. He's been pretty quiet for a while now, but on seeing this, I couldn't resist...the "reverend's" Escalade gets stolen and stripped...while he's touting "green" crap.
Disrespecting Jesse
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Dr. Alveda King – the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., – explains why she’s speaking at the Glenn Beck 8/28 rally in Washington this Saturday.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Scareder and scareder!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chuck --
Yesterday, Barack Obama sent the following email to our top supporters to engage you in a critical campaign and to raise urgent funds to meet our grassroots goal before Tuesday's FEC reporting deadline. The Republicans have posted huge fundraising numbers and this week they publicly announced a $50 million negative advertising campaign. We must be able to go toe-to-toe. Please answer the President's challenge today and give $5 or more today.
Contribute today and your gift will be matched dollar-for-dollar>>
Jon Vogel
DCCC Executive Director
From: Barack Obama Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:27am To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Subject: Make No Mistake |
Friend --
When I took office, we had a big choice to make. We could do what was easy to get through the next election or we could do what was hard - and right - to help the next generation.
Our extraordinary House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and my Democratic partners in the House chose to lead. They chose to do the real heavy lifting to get our economy back on track and to restore the American dream for every American.
Make no mistake about it. Democrats will retain the House of Representatives this year, as long as you continue working to help them win.
Tuesday marks a critical FEC reporting deadline for my friends at the DCCC, the only Democratic political committee solely dedicated to protecting the House. I'm asking for your help to make their $1 Million grassroots goal before midnight Tuesday to continue the work we've only just begun.
Contribute before midnight August 31st to make sure that I keep my great Democratic Partners in the House. Your gift today will be matched by a group of generous Democrats.
![]() |
The steady progress we are seeing toward America's recovery is no accident. It's happened because I've had Democratic partners in the House and Senate who have chosen to tackle problems that Washington talked about for decades but always just kicked down the road. Not anymore.
From the Recovery Act, to health insurance reform, to landmark clean energy legislation, to Wall Street reform, Speaker Pelosi and Democrats in Congress have passed the bills because they put the American peoples' interests before the special interests. Now they need your help.
I know what a difference grassroots support can make in a tough fight. In the same way that you helped me defy the pundits and stand strong against the attacks from those who wish to protect the status quo, I need your help to make a difference right now to retain a Democratic House.
Contribute before midnight August 31st to make sure that I keep my great Democratic Partners in the House. Your gift today will be matched by a group of generous Democrats.
There is so much more work to get done. Now is not the time to turn back.
Now is the time to remind ourselves what we can achieve together with Speaker Pelosi leading a Democratic House for another two years.
This is our moment to retain a Democratic House and continue America's progress.
Thank you,
Barack Obama
P.S. Contributing to my friends at the DCCC is a wise investment. They have a proven track record of success and every dollar in the door means another race that will have the resources it needs to fight back. Contribute to have your gift matched today.
![]() |
(202) 863-1500 | www.dccc.org | Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. |
This message was sent to: ckuecker@ckent.org | To unsubscribe, click here: http://dccc.org/optout.
To always receive our emails, add dccc@dccc.org to your address book. Learn how.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Osama must be about out of piss by now. Nappy change time!
Wisconsin attempting to strip veterans of their votes
10 States Seek Waiver to Comply With Military Voting Law’s Absentee Ballot Rules
Kohl, Feingold and all the other Demonrats must be pissing themselves at the thought of how all those servicemen and women overseas would vote if allowed to.
UPDATE 8/28/10 - Petition refused, for Wisconsin. I guess our "leaders" will just have to take their chances in the election.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Road rage
Driving the truck home with a customer's trimming machine in back today, I decided to take a back road. E B C Townline Road in Rock County takes about a mile off the trip.
The last time I drove this road, it was in terrible shape - potholes and spots where the pavement was gone for three foot patches down to gravel. Well, today, I found the local road crew had "patched" the worst areas.
They must use these back roads as a training ground for patching crews. The job was barely adequate to make the worst patches navigable without breaking the suspension. The quality was what one would expect from someone's brother-in-law's political patronage job in Chicago. Not anywhere near the quality I have come to expect in Wisconsin - at least on major highways.
That was OK - then I got to the intersection of Carver's Rock Road going south. This used to be a 'Y' on Carver's Rock, so traffic in and out of that road could turn without slowing excessively.
The local brainiacs in charge decided to make it a literal 'Y' - with no straight connection across the top for E B C Townline Road. One evidently is expected to make the left onto southbound Carver's Rock Road, then make a sharp right to get back on the westbound road. They excavated about a foot of pavement out between the arms of the 'Y', and there was no warning as to construction.
I hit the excavated area going about 50. It's at the top of a hill, so it's invisible until you get about 50 yards from the excavation. With a load in the bed, I was not inclined to slam on the brakes, and simply bounced through. Lucky me - nothing got bent or broken.
People in positions of power that do things like this are the reason God invented tar, feathers, and rails, if not tall trees, a horse, and a rope.
Nastygrams going out as soon as I find out who to send them to...
Update - I called WI DOT - they told me to talk to Rock County. Rock County told me it was the Town of Clinton's business. Left a message at the number for the town supervisor. He never returned my call - but on the way to deliver that machine, I took the town line road - and now there are big barricades up to warn about the dropoff. So my calling had a good effect.
Another nail in America's coffin
Line in the sand?
Important message from Der Fuhrer!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chuck --
When I took office, we had a big choice to make. We could do what was easy to get through the next election or we could do what was hard - and right - to help the next generation.
Our extraordinary House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and my Democratic partners in the House chose to lead. They chose to do the real heavy lifting to get our economy back on track and to restore the American dream for every American.
Make no mistake about it. Democrats will retain the House of Representatives this year, as long as you continue working to help them win.
Tuesday marks a critical FEC reporting deadline for my friends at the DCCC, the only Democratic political committee solely dedicated to protecting the House. I'm asking for your help to make their $1 Million grassroots goal before midnight Tuesday to continue the work we've only just begun.
Contribute before midnight August 31st to make sure that I keep my great Democratic Partners in the House. Your gift today will be matched by a group of generous Democrats.
![]() |
The steady progress we are seeing toward America's recovery is no accident. It's happened because I've had Democratic partners in the House and Senate who have chosen to tackle problems that Washington talked about for decades but always just kicked down the road. Not anymore.
From the Recovery Act, to health insurance reform, to landmark clean energy legislation, to Wall Street reform, Speaker Pelosi and Democrats in Congress have passed the bills because they put the American peoples' interests before the special interests. Now they need your help.
I know what a difference grassroots support can make in a tough fight. In the same way that you helped me defy the pundits and stand strong against the attacks from those who wish to protect the status quo, I need your help to make a difference right now to retain a Democratic House.
Contribute before midnight August 31st to make sure that I keep my great Democratic Partners in the House. Your gift today will be matched by a group of generous Democrats.
There is so much more work to get done. Now is not the time to turn back.
Now is the time to remind ourselves what we can achieve together with Speaker Pelosi leading a Democratic House for another two years.
This is our moment to retain a Democratic House and continue America's progress.
Thank you,
Barack Obama
P.S. Contributing to my friends at the DCCC is a wise investment. They have a proven track record of success and every dollar in the door means another race that will have the resources it needs to fight back. Contribute to have your gift matched today.
![]() |
(202) 863-1500 | www.dccc.org | Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. |
This message was sent to: ckuecker@ckent.org | To unsubscribe, click here: http://dccc.org/optout.
To always receive our emails, add dccc@dccc.org to your address book. Learn how.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Osama must be starting to crap his pants - he might lose the House to people interested in America as is should be, not the American Soviet Socialist Republic he wants to bring forth.
SO - If you want to ensure that Osama loses his "great Demonrat partners", contribute to their opposition, and campaign for them. The lefties are going to be out there, along with ACORN and all the usual suspects...
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Damn!
As is usual with socialist types, he was a hypocrite.
(H/t Drudge)
Fan mail from some flounder
Not quite sure what (s)he wanted to convey, but it involved news clippings (unattributed) and Xerox copies of pages from a book, complete with yellow highlighter and not too coherent handwritten comments.
Got the scanner back up, so here it is.
First, the envelope, no return address. I've cropped out my address - anyone who wants it can do the minimal work to find it. Anonymous did!

Note the familiarity, or attempt to belittle me, via the "Chucky". Sad.
On the back flap is the word "Picolu", possibly "Picolo". Unsure.
Page 1:

Note to Anonymous - it's spelled "suggest", and apostrophes are not used for plurals.
NASA has been at the forefront of the "climategate" scandal. Amateur scientists have discovered and pointed out errors made by NASA satellite data compilers.
Wikipedia article
Errors in NASA records
An interesting video
Ice sheets floating on the ocean are larger in volume frozen than melted, so if the ice sheets are melting, ocean levels should be going down.
Osama's place of birth is not an issue - IF his mother was an American citizen at the time of the birth. What ever gave you the idea that this is an issue with me? The big question for me is - why is Osama willing to spend millions to keep his records secret? It promotes suspicion.
How, exactly, does a House resolution commemorating Hawaii figure here? The vote on returning the stolen GM and Chrysler stock to the people who paid for it is more interesting - and that CONgress refused to stop future bailouts.
Page 2:
It would be nice to know what this was copied from. If you want to get someone to change their opinions, at least tell them what book you were reading!Hoover, Nixon, and G. W. Bush. All three at least did not actively try to enslave the American people. Perhaps Anonymous means they were among the worst at furthering Communism here. Surprised (s)he didn't include both Bushes and Reagan.
What channel? Who, exactly, is laughing at me? I love to entertain people!
So, I should listen to known left-wing biased news to get the "truth"?
Not sure what the bit at the bottom is - I'm not a Republican - I spend a lot of time telling them to quit sending me begging letters.
I am definitely a conservative - I want to conserve our freedoms, even for douches like Anonymous.
Is that "nickle head" or "nuckle head"? Please explain, so I can rebut.
Seems like Anonymous doesn't like Fox News. Well, I don't watch it, or any TV news, regularly, and know they are as prone to sensationalism as the rest of the MSM. At lest they present news that the rest of the MSM glosses over.
Page 3:

So, some inland glaciers melted. So what? Once upon a time, in a place under my feet, there was a glacier over 3 km thick. It went away, too.
I have no idea what prompted this - my blog, a letter I sent to the newspaper, a comment I made on another blog, or whatever.
If you want my respect, at least be brave enough to give me a name and address, or even a phone number, so I can have a real communication with you. Mine are public record.
Chuck Kuecker
Saturday, August 21, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Now we get to read the bill...
(H/t Sipsey Street Irregulars)
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
That Darn Mosque
That Darn Mosque
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Climate change! Hide!
My reply:
On Wednesday, August 12th, there was a front-page article about how the world is going to end if we all don't "do something right now" about "climate change". Back in the 1970's, we were supposed to prepare for an ice age - then in the 1990's, for "global warming". Neither seems imminent today, so now it's "climate change", something that cannot be measured. We need to do something now, before the truth comes out and ruins the crisis.
It's called "weather" by people who don't have a political or ideological axe to grind. Heat waves, rain, storms, drought - it's all happened before, and likely it will all happen again.
The "experts" such as the UN's IPCC, have been pretty much shown up as charlatans and liars, pushing "climate change" as a means to a one-world government with strict controls over all of human activity - except for the elite, such as Al Gore, who will live their lavish lifestyles on the backs of the peons who will pay the "carbon taxes" demanded to end the "crisis".
Computer models are only as good as the input they are given, and the understanding of the modeler of the system being modeled. Climate models are far from exact - and reputable climatologist will admit this. We can't even reliably predict rain and violent storms more than a day in advance - how can we expect to model the whole Earth's climate?
Why, exactly, did this column rate a special highlighting? Isn't it about time for the media to realize the massive con-job that has been attempted has misfired, and the people are wise to the machinations of the radical environmentalists?
Enough with the "climate change". Please refer to "weather" as weather from now on - it's still news, but Chicken Little has left the building.
Chuck Kuecker
Saturday, August 7, 2010
Commemorating the end of the war in Japan
From Borepatch:
The Atomic Bomb
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan
Kagan tied to Obama's birth certificate
I just tried to call Kohl again to remind him about our desire NOT to have Kagan on the Court. His aide said she had been confirmed a while ago.
I just sent him this:
OK, so now it's too late.
Are you aware that as Solicitor General, Ms. Kagan was involved in issues related to Mr. Obama's eligibility to be President?
I think some checking is in order - and possibly, someone concerned about his constituents might just want to ask some questions, even belatedly?
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Email from Herb Kohl
"I rise today in support of General Kagan’s nomination to the Supreme Court. Her confirmation will be a milestone that we can all be proud of -- for the first time in history three women will be serving on the Supreme Court at one time.
General Kagan came before the Judiciary Committee with an impressive resume that had all the trappings of an accomplished lawyer worthy of appointment to the Supreme Court. During her hearings she proved herself to be well qualified for the job.
She impressed us with her sharp mind, keen intellect, and comprehensive knowledge of the Constitution and the law. She pledged to consider each case with an open mind and to impartially uphold the rule of law. And, she appeared mindful of the need for judicial modesty and fidelity to precedent, but not when it stands in the way of ending injustice or guaranteeing our fundamental rights.
At times during the hearing, Solicitor General Kagan seemed to be somewhat more candid than previous nominees. She disavowed a purely originalist interpretation of the Constitution, recognizing that such a limited approach will not always solve our 21st Century problems. And, I was pleased that she unequivocally expressed her support for opening the Supreme Court to cameras. So I believe that with General Kagan’s confirmation the American people will be one step closer to seeing for themselves the Supreme Court debate our most pressing legal and Constitutional issues.
But, despite the strength of her qualifications, like so many nominees before her, General Kagan often retreated to the generalities and platitudes that she once criticized. I am pleased that she rejected the analogy that Supreme Court Justices are like umpires, simply calling balls and strikes. Instead, she acknowledged that each Justice’s legal judgment determines the outcome of close cases. But, at times her answers gave us too little insight into what informs her unique legal judgment and how it will impact those close cases.
As I have said before, the confirmation process demands more than that. This was the public’s only opportunity to hear from General Kagan. In my opinion, she made small in-roads, but we still have a long way to go in meeting the high standard to which we should hold Supreme Court nominees during their confirmation hearings.
In sum, I am voting for General Kagan because she is unquestionably well qualified, has a record of being a principled, consensus-building lawyer, and because I believe her judicial philosophy is within the mainstream of our country’s legal thought. I am confident that she will make a superb Supreme Court Justice and is a worthy nominee to carry on Justice Stevens’ long legacy of exemplary public service to our nation."
My response email - also a call to his office at (202) 224-5653:
Evidently you do not pay attention to your employer's wishes. You have been told time and again that Ms. Elena Kagan is unsuitable for a position on the Supreme Court. Any thinking individual who has listened to her comments during the confirmation process knows she is unfit to be a judge of any sort in this country, let alone on our highest court.
You will PLEASE vote NO on this appointment, if you care one whit for the people you serve. You are already marked for retirement at the next election by your actions to date - at least leave office with SOME credible actions in your record!
NO on Kagan. We have spoken. Hear us.
By the way - three women on the Court is nothing to be proud of, unless they are all dedicated to upholding the Constitution as written. Ms. Kagan has proven she is not interested in doing that
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Since when does a douche-bag like Kagan get addressed as "General", anyway?
UPDATE: Got an email from Herb this morning in response - essentially the same text as above, with a personalized first line.
Monday, August 2, 2010
The federal government can do "most anything"
Another good reason to vote 'em all out.












