Rumor - or truth?
Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an
attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret
Service agents (not just those guarding the president), and others of
the U.S. Secret Service including uniformed division officers, physical
security technicians and specialists, and other ‘special officers’, to
arrest and remove an elected sheriff for refusing to enforce the law (or
anyone breaking the law).
The bills being introduced defines law as including any rule, regulation, executive order, court order, statute or constitutional provision.
Why are they doing this? Here’s why…
It would establish federal authority police powers in a State, enabling
an enforcement arm reporting directly to the president (Secret Service).
It would enable the president / executive branch to theoretically
override the actions and preventative measures that are now being taken
by many States throughout the country who are trying to preserve 2nd
Amendment gun rights and who are prohibiting the enforcement of
unconstitutional law passed by Congress or pushed by executive order.
As some of you may know, a growing list of sheriffs (more than 340 so
far) across the country have expressed that they will not enforce a
Washington mandate that clearly violates the Second Amendment.
Many State laws to preserve gun rights are gaining momentum. States
include Montana, Ohio, Kentucky, Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas,
Arizona, Michigan, Utah, and New Mexico.
It would be nice to provide a link to the bill in question. I haven't the time to research this right now - anyone know more - or have evidence?
No comments:
Post a Comment