From someone who should know

Russian Calls Out Barack Obama As A Communist

Barack Obama is called a pure Communist by the Russian Press and many in Russia are making that statement. Maybe that is why the Boston Bombers could get away with what they did. It seems that Russia knew that the older brother was one to watch and they informed our intelligence community of it, yet the FBI once again failed because they “did not want to inflame people with Jihad connections or ideology!” Obama has declared that the United States will not “attack” those who hate the United States and instead, Obama wants to try to appease the situation in the terrorists’ favor. One individual, a man named Xavier Lerma, who wrote many articles about Obama and what he has done, along with calling the people of the United States stupid and ignorant for putting him in office has openly called Obama a Communist! His article, “Obama’s Soviet Mistake,” discusses why what Obama is doing now has been done before in Russia and it failed.
Mr. Lerma stated:

“Putin in 2009 outlined his strategy for economic success. Alas, poor Obama did the opposite but nevertheless was re-elected. Bye, bye Miss American Pie. The Communists have won in America with Obama but failed miserably in Russia with Zyuganov who only received 17% of the vote. Vladimir Putin was re-elected as President keeping the NWO order out of Russia while America continues to repeat the Soviet mistake.”

Yes -WHY is our media so intent on ignoring reality?

Help needed

Calling all Vietnam veterans:

Can you please distribute the below request to you distribution list. Thanks

 

Any US Navy sailor on board a US Navy ship during the Vietnam War: I am requesting notarized sworn testimonials from sailors who saw barrels of agent orange and agent white on board their ship. Barrels would have an orange or white painted stripe around the middle or top of the barrels.  

Details: Name of ship to include hull number. Port where picked up and port where off loaded. Means used to load and off load the barrels. Any spills from damage and means to clean it up.

There will be no repercussions attributed with your testimonial, testimonials are in witness and are not classified information.

I want to build a case that the DoD and Dept of the Navy did not be truthful about these barrels being transported on board US Navy ships. At some point in time, I hope to testify before Congress relative to the Agent Orange Bills.

Send me a message or e-mail me at johnb1936@verizon.net 

If you are willing to provide me with your sworn testimonial. Thank you.

Carbon Belch Day

Celebrate with me on Saturday.

Internal combustion rules!

Damn. It's going to be cold enough that burning fossil fuel won't be gratuitous...

Know your elements

The Periodic Table on YouTube

Fluorine:

Letter to the Editor

Stateline News - the local shopper paper - this time. The writer tells us to fight Keystone XL and stop burning fossil fuels in favor of "renewables".

Here's what I sent:

Loren Johnson of Elkhorn tells us that "climate change" is settled science, and that we must stop a pipeline that will help us reduce our dependence on foreign oil and provide thousands of jobs in a depressed economy.

His "settled science" claim falls apart in the face of publication of emails between "climate scientists" who conspired to cherry-pick their data to "hide the decline" and produce scary "hockey stick" graphs that enable people like Al Gore to become billionaires preying on the fear of the uneducated.

Does he know that water vapor - which is always present in the atmosphere at much higher levels than carbon dioxide, is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2? Perhaps we should cap the lakes and oceans first before we stop using fossil fuels.

I agree that we should someday phase out fossil fuels - when we have a reliable, economically viable replacement for them. We have one clean, reliable, and proven power source available right now. Nuclear power. Too bad it's "politically incorrect" to even speak of it.

"Renewable fuels" will never replace oil, coal, and natural gas, even if all the arable land on Earth was converted from food production to bio-fuels. Our standard of living would return to that of the Middle Ages - and our population would perforce need to be reduced to that level to prevent mass starvation.

Like it or not, man is not responsible for "climate change".

Chuck Kuecker

Mike Fitzpatrick gun control survey

Here

He's running in Pennsylvania, but any education we can give him is worthwhile.

Reply from Tammy Gay

I've sent emails and letters telling this person "NO more gun control", and have included the Einstein quote about insanity more than once.

Color me surprised at her reply. He's in favor of universal checks, magazine and "assault weapon" bans, and "more research".

++++++++++++++++++++

Thank you for contacting me about federal gun policy. I value your input on a topic that involves fundamental constitutional rights and the safety of our families and communities.

The horrific tragedy at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut in December of last year has prompted a national dialogue on guns and federal gun policy. Other mass killings at Fort Hood in Texas; at a grocery store in Tucson, Arizona; at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado; and in a place of worship in Oak Creek, Wisconsin have heightened our focus on strategies to reduce gun violence and save lives. But, the death of 20 young school children and six teachers at Sandy Hook demands that we try to find common ground to take action without violating constitutional rights.

A wide range of policy options have been put forth as a part of this conversation. In January, President Obama outlined his plan to reduce gun violence in the United States. Additionally, several bills relating to gun violence have been offered in both Houses of Congress and Congressional Committees are holding Hearings to inform the path forward.

In addition to hearing from you, it has been important to me to listen to Wisconsinites with various perspectives on the issue. To date, I have met with Chiefs of Police from a number of communities, family members of the fallen at Oak Creek, sportsmen and women, and researchers seeking to better understand what policies can be effective as we seek to reduce gun injury and death. I look forward to gaining additional insight as we continue the work on solutions to prevent gun violence.

Debates over gun policies often evoke strong responses because throughout our policymaking, we must safeguard constitutional rights at the same time as we endeavor to safeguard communities and combat crime. I am a gun owner and firmly believe in the Second Amendment and the right of law-abiding Americans to keep and bear arms. I also believe that, as the Supreme Court has ruled, this right can be reconciled with reasonable, common sense safety measures.

Ever since passage of the Brady Act in 1993, federal law has required criminal background checks for certain gun purchases. In the 20 years since the passage of the Brady Act and with the advent and widespread use of e-commerce, an increasing number of gun sales occur without a criminal background check.  I support requiring background checks on all gun sales. In addition, I support giving law enforcement additional tools to crack down on gun trafficking and the straw purchasers who help get guns into the hands of criminals.

The recent tragedies across the nation also give us reason to reassess our mental health system. Most people with mental illness will never become violent. However, if mental health treatment and services were more readily available, we would see fewer people in situations that spiral out of control. I believe that we should have a special emphasis on young adults, as most mental illnesses manifest themselves by the time a person reaches young adulthood. I have previously worked to ensure mental health parity, so that insurance policies cover mental illness in the same way that they cover physical illness. While mental health parity is now the law, it has not been fully implemented and its benefits are not felt by those Americans who lack insurance coverage.

I support the President's call to restore research funding that can help us study gun violence, gun injury prevention and gun safety.  Limits have been placed on such funding by Congress for a number of years, and it is high time those restrictions be lifted. Accurate data and careful, objective evaluation of that data informs better policy.

The President's plan to reduce gun violence in the United States makes a series of recommendations that include instituting a ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines. Each of these proposals will get careful scrutiny. Every year in Wisconsin, hundreds of thousands of Wisconsinites go hunting. It is a time-honored tradition that is a part of our state's culture. We must assure that these proposals do nothing to inhibit the celebrated sporting heritage of our state. I look forward to reviewing these proposals and working with my colleagues to find common ground, so that we can reduce gun violence in this country while protecting everyone's Second Amendment rights.

+++

Please know that I will keep your thoughts and suggestions in mind as Congress considers gun policy legislation.

Once again, thank you for contacting my office.  It is important for me to hear from the people of Wisconsin on the issues, thoughts and concerns that matter most to you.  If I can be of further assistance, please visit my website at www.baldwin.senate.gov for information on how to contact my office.
Sincerely,
Tammy Baldwin
United States Senator

++++++++++++++++++++

I am sure her definition of "gun safety" does not include the Four Rules. It sure won't involve Eddie Eagle or teaching gun safety in grade school.

Current events

This guy tells it like it is:

545 vs 300,000,000

EVERY  CITIZEN NEEDS TO READ THIS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS JOURNALIST HAS  SCRIPTED IN THIS MESSAGE.  READ IT  AND THEN REALLY THINK ABOUT  OUR CURRENT POLITICAL DEBACLE.
 
by Charlie Reese:

Politicians are the only people in the world  who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever  wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if  all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have  inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget.  The president does.

You and I don't have the  Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of  Representatives does.  They alone hold America's government purse strings.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress  does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You  and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve  Bank does, and it's a private corporation, not part of government.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one  president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human  beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally,  and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague  this country.

 Read the whole thing. Think. ACT.

Busy tomorrow night?

Rock River Patriots Meeting this Friday April 12th

We would like to welcome everyone to our next meeting at the Library in Fort Atkinson.
The address is 209 Merchants Ave, Fort Atkinson, WI 53538.

At Friday nights meeting we have a special guest speaker who many of you may already know.

We would like to welcome Loren Spivack “The Free Market Warrior” was born and raised in Massachusetts and spent most of his adult life in New York City. Before becoming active in politics, Spivack worked for several non-profits and as a management consultant for both profit and non-profit companies.

Spivack founded “Free Market Warrior” in 2009 in an effort to make a positive difference in American politics and economics.

He was expelled from Concord Mills Mall in North Carolina in July of 2009 for selling material critical of the Obama Administration.  (Mall owners, Simon Property Group, are major Democratic donors.) Since then Loren has devoted his time to teaching

conservative groups about free market economics. He conducts “Economic Literacy” seminars across the United States. So far, Spivack has delivered his famous seminar on “Economic Literacy” to almost 200 groups in 17 states.

Spivack is also the author of the recently published “The New Democrat” a parody history of the Obama administration, based on a famous children’s book.  With pitch-perfect rhyme and clever illustrations, “The New Democrat” transforms the political personalities of our times into cartoon characters in a conservative morality play.

Spivack’s second book “The Gorax” is an anti-environmentalist/pro capitalism parody starring Al Gore and presenting his movement as a threat to American freedom and standard of living.  Once again Spivack is both funny and poignant as he makes the case that capitalism (represented by the “Onepercentler”) is the real victim of environmentalist wackos who destroy prosperity without achieving even their own goals.  In between, he takes shots at everything from The Fed to the teachers unions.  “The Gorax” will be available spring 2013.

We look forward to seeing all of you this coming Friday night.

Unbelievable

That flight-critical aircraft systems would be unencrypted...

Hacker uses an Android to remotely attack and hijack an airplane 

The Hack in the Box (#HITB2013AMS) security conference in Amsterdam has a very interesting lineup of talks [pdf]. One that jumped out was the Aircraft Hacking: Practical Aero Series presented by Hugo Teso, a security consultant at n.runs in Germany.

According to the abstract, “This presentation will be a practical demonstration on how to remotely attack and take full control of an aircraft, exposing some of the results of my three years research on the aviation security field. The attack performed will follow the classical methodology, divided in discovery, information gathering, exploitation and post-exploitation phases. The complete attack will be accomplished remotely, without needing physical access to the target aircraft at any time, and a testing laboratory will be used to attack virtual airplanes systems.

Well, he only hacked a "virtual" airplane, but why in HELL was this not thought of when they designed those systems?

Idiots. I'm ashamed of some of my fellow engineers.

Indoctrination

Prof at public univ under investigation for allegedly forcing students to make anti-gun posters

A professor at a public university in Texas is under investigation from school administrators for allegedly forcing students in her graphic design class to create anti-gun posters for a personal anti-gun campaign she had launched.

Midwestern State University Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Betty Stewart confirmed to Campus Reform Friday the school has launched an investigation into professor Jennifer Yucus’ conduct after a student filed an official complaint on Thursday.

According to the complaint, obtained by Campus Reform, the professor compelled students in her graphic design class to create artwork opposing firearms on campus and opposing pro-gun legislation currently pending before the Texas state legislature.

The professor then used the artwork students created online to publicize an anti-gun petition entitled “MSU is anti-Concealed Carry on Campus” and on a now deleted Facebook page opposing firearms, says the complaint.

 

You go, girl!

I wish we had a few million more like her.

Extremists

I'm on the list. Are you?

Am I a Dangerous Extremist? Are You?

• Posted by Alan Caruba on April 9, 2013 at 4:05pm in Tea Party Nation Forum
• View Discussions

By Alan Caruba

If you should suddenly cease to find my commentaries, I will either have passed away or have been detained by agents of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or the Defense Department and taken to an undisclosed location for the crime of having been an “extremist” and a danger to the nation.

In April 2009, the Washington Times published an article reporting that “The Department of Homeland Security is warning law enforcement officials about a rise in ‘rightwing extremist activity’, saying that the economic recession, the election of America’s first black president, and the return of a few disgruntled war veterans could swell the ranks of white-power militias.”

Among those targeted by DHS were “groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single-issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.” Well, that’s only a few tens of millions of Americans. Little wonder why, on April 5th, we learned that a U.S. Army Reserve presentation regarding “extremist threats within the U.S. military included Catholics and evangelicals!

These two groups represent half of all Americans and some forty percent of active duty military personnel are evangelical Christians. The Catholics and evangelicals were lumped in with “white supremacist groups, street gangs, and religious sects.”

If our current leaders consider Christians a greater threat than Muslims, then they are idiots with a very dangerous agenda.

It begins

Remember all those people who insist that registration and gun control don't directly lead to confiscation?

New York is moving to Act II of the script:

NYS Police Departments Revoking Pistol Permits because of Anti-Anxiety Meds

This is hot off the press. I have first-hand knowledge that local NYS police departments are revoking pistol permits of those who are "blown-in" by the medical community for being prescribed anti-anxiety medications (for those who are in therapy for anxiety or depression), under the gray shroud of the UNSAFE Act. This is happening now folks, and it is likely to get worse.

EVERYONE needs to be aware of this, for the sake of keeping their pistol permit in NYS. Please spread this information around - Facebook, Twitter, by every means possible. We need to get the word out as quickly as possible.

If anyone faces such an ordeal with their pistol permit, or you know anyone in the future who faces this issue, you are urged to email info@tresmondlaw.com. It doesn't matter where you are located in NY.

By all means use this thread to discuss - this is something that was mentioned as a potential major issue with the new laws signed by Cuomo, and it's becoming reality.

Audio here: http://www.wben.com/topic/play_window.php?audioType=Episode&audioId=6319907

Found through Ammoland.

Top Ten tune in the UK

A view of America's future?

Janesville Freedom Rally

Saturday, May 4th, there will be a Freedom Rally at the lower courthouse park, Court Street and St Lawrence, Janesville, from 12 noon until 3 PM. This is the big park just west of the Rock County Courthouse.

Come join the Wisconsin III% Militia and your neighbors to support our freedoms!

Insanity

Letter to the editor this morning in the Janesville Gazette. I can't find the original on their web site - it might be posted tomorrow, or they might not post letters to the editor. If I can find a link, I'll update this post.

Anyway, "Augie Augenstein" opines that we ought to license and register guns and gun owners just like cars and drivers, and somehow feels that persons using guns in crimes are not "held accountable" because we don't have this registry. He pulls up a reference to a poll where "90% of Americans" want more gun control, but neglects to tell us who ran that poll.

He tells us that here in America no one has ever come for our guns, so why worry. Ignorance is no excuse for trying to destroy our freedoms.

He wonders why NOW we are worried about gun control. I've got news for you, Augie - gun owners have been worried since 1934 nationally, and since the 1890's locally, if they were awake.

Then he tells us to be concerned about who has the ears of our leaders - at least he gets that one right. As long as we let people like George Soros and outfits like the Communist Party  of America tell our leaders what "we" want, we are in grave danger.

My response:

Augie Augenstein of Janesville needs a history lesson.

First, cars are nowhere mentioned in the Constitution. Guns - 'arms' - are expressly protected from legislation. Substitute "pen" for "gun" in your argument, and see where you end up.

Second, "90% of American people" is 90% of some poll, likely by the Joyce Foundation or one of their anti-gun groups. Anyway, you don't change the Constitution with opinion polls.

History tells us that first comes gun registration, then gun confiscation - and all too often, genocide. History. Read up on it, or get taken by surprise.

Definitely worry about who has the ears of our lawmakers. George Soros, international socialists, the American Communist Party...

You want to stop violent criminals who ignore thousands of laws to commit their crimes? You won't do this by infringing on our God-given right to self-defense, or violating our Constitution.

Trying to stop bad guys with guns by making it more difficult for good guys to get them is like trying to stop home fires by requiring a waiting period and government permits for fire extinguishers.

None of the proposed laws - or what has been passed in Connecticut - would have prevented Sandy Hook - and it won't stop the next tragedy. You can be sure that there will always be people who will insist on "more controls" despite the obvious failure of past efforts.

Albert Einstein said it: "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."

Naval history

The last of the breed

One reason Ill-Annoys is in trouble

They keep electing geniuses like this:



The theater in Colorado was posted "no weapons" - so of course no one pulled their gun and shot the perpetrator - because they were all law-abiding folks and he was a criminal.

Duh.

Found at Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler

History lesson

The NRA was not created to let fat white crackers shoot guns:

CCW class

A free CCW class will be held at 9am April 20th at the IBEW union hall, 17 S River St # 101, Janesville, WI 53548.




Call Sean Anderson at (608) 290-2698 to reserve a seat.



Sponsored by the Wisconsin III% Militia.

A reformed liberal speaks

This is great. Found at Ace of Spades:

No, he can't

I wonder if Sheriff Spoden is on the list...

 Rumor - or truth?

Federal Framework Being Set Up To Arrest Sheriffs

Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret Service agents (not just those guarding the president), and others of the U.S. Secret Service including uniformed division officers, physical security technicians and specialists, and other ‘special officers’, to arrest and remove an elected sheriff for refusing to enforce the law (or anyone breaking the law).

The bills being introduced defines law as including any rule, regulation, executive order, court order, statute or constitutional provision.

Why are they doing this? Here’s why…

It would establish federal authority police powers in a State, enabling an enforcement arm reporting directly to the president (Secret Service).

It would enable the president / executive branch to theoretically override the actions and preventative measures that are now being taken by many States throughout the country who are trying to preserve 2nd Amendment gun rights and who are prohibiting the enforcement of unconstitutional law passed by Congress or pushed by executive order.
As some of you may know, a growing list of sheriffs (more than 340 so far) across the country have expressed that they will not enforce a Washington mandate that clearly violates the Second Amendment.

Many State laws to preserve gun rights are gaining momentum. States include Montana, Ohio, Kentucky, Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, Michigan, Utah, and New Mexico.

It would be nice to provide a link to the bill in question. I haven't the time to research this right now - anyone know more - or have evidence?

I knew it

Liars.

Media Lied About Sandy Hook Shooter? Say It Isn’t So!

Of course, Reuters would counter that the NRA is defensive and lying, or something along that line. Except for one problem that challenges Reuters’ credibility: Reuters conveniently left out the most important item in the killer’s inventory.

In early March, top law enforcement officials attended a semi-annual meeting in New Orleans. Danny Stebbins, a colonel from the Connecticut State Police, presented his report on the Sandy Hook shooting.
Investigators found a “spreadsheet 7 feet long and 4 feet wide.” This spreadsheet contained “extensive research” of “mass murders of the past, and even attempted murders.” Police concluded: “They don’t believe this was just a spreadsheet. They believe it was a score sheet.”

“We were told [the murderer] had around 500 people on this sheet,” a law enforcement veteran told me Saturday night. “Names and the number of people killed and the weapons that were used, even the precise make and model of the weapons. It had to have taken years. It sounded like a doctoral thesis, that was the quality of the research.”

Police reached other conclusions:

• This was the work of a video gamer who intended to place his name on top as all-time high scorer in real-life shoot-em-ups.
• He picked the elementary school because it offered the best opportunity to “score” the most points before police arrived to stop him.
• Video gamers lose all their points to the character who kills them, so this murderer planned to “retain” his points by committing suicide so law enforcement couldn’t take his points.
• Said one official: “They have pictures from two years before, with the guy all strapped with weapons, posing with a pistol to his head. That’s the thing you have to understand: He had this laid out for years before.” [emphasis added]

Reuters didn’t tell the whole truth because the anti-rights narrative succeeds by sympathizing with murderers and derogating law-abiding citizens. The NRA is America’s oldest civil rights and gun safety organization. But the NRA stands in the way of the anti-rights agenda, so the NRA, consisting of nearly five million law-abiding Americans, must be demonized in order to destroy its influence.

Corrupt media’s goal is to stop people from learning the truth about the Sandy Hook shooting, and instead socially engineer Americans into willingly surrendering their civil right of self-defense. To accomplish this, any lie is acceptable.

 

Waste of our taxes

Immoral, too. We paid for that brass, not to have it shredded.

Military installations sidestep questions on brass destruction

“I'm responding to a tip that Ft. McCoy brass from expended small arms ammunition is being shredded instead of sold on the civilian market,” this columnist wrote in the base contact form. “I’m told that as of the beginning of this month, no brass may be sold without being rendered unusable.

“Is this true?” the query continued “Is or was brass being destroyed? If so, who ordered it, over what time period, under what authority, and will you make a copy of such orders public? Did an order to destroy brass once exist and has it been rescinded? When and by whom? Does everything that is being destroyed meet the criteria of being ‘unserviceable or unsafe for further use’? What is the policy for destruction of brass that could be sold on the civilian market? Are all destruction activities consistent with appropriations and public law requirements?

“I'm following up on this because I've written in the past about the military destroying brass that, per appropriations requirements, should be designated for civilian market resale,” the inquiry explained. “As such, I'd like to establish the truth about this and make sure all of the points brought to my attention are addressed as specifically as possible.

“To that end, any for-the record response you could give to address these questions will be helpful and appreciated, as would any further information you could share about this,” the inquiry concluded.

“In reference to your Fort McCoy web site inquiry, please see view the article that was recently published in the Fort McCoy newspaper, The Real McCoy,” the Public Affairs Officer wrote back. That article confirms they are using a deformer “to demilitarize about 9,000 pounds of brass each day … including 5.56-mm, 7.62-mm, 9-mm and .50-caliber, and that “the ammo is transported up a conveyor belt and then struck by hammers in a rotary grinder that cause deformation of the casing.”

 

ACLU antics

So, right after posting about the Fabians, I hear about the ACLU filing a federal lawsuit against some Beloit elementary schools because the have single-sex classes.

ACLU wants the court to rule that somehow having boys and girls separate so they can concentrate on what little actual learning they still get in our public schools is somehow in violation of the Constitution.

Someone should tell them the ERA never passed.

Looks to me like the Fabians' right hand doesn't know what their left hand is trying to do.

Fabians

Did a search for "Fabian window" to show my son-in-law what the true "new world order" is all about. Found this old but still so true article from the Canada Free Press:

Beware Obama’s Fabian Window

- William Kevin Stoos (Bio and Archives)  Friday, August 21, 2009 

If you feel the ground shaking under your feet; if the America you once knew seems to be changing daily; if you feel that you have less and less control over your life and the country is being governed from the top down, then you should take heed. 

Why do we have to go to Canada to get the truth about America? Could the media be in the pocket of the Fabians?

Built to commemorate the founding of the Fabian Socialist Society, the Fabian Window contains images that are clear, unapologetic and, as a friend of mine once said—brazen. It is one thing, as Lenin said, to howl like wolves in order to live among wolves; however it is quite another to advertise the fact that you are a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Yet, the socialists who constructed the window had no qualms about advertising the fact that they had a hidden (or not so hidden) agenda when it comes to reshaping the world.

The window contains the image of two men—founders of the society—hammering the globe (from the top down no less) with sledgehammers—imposing their will on the world so to speak. They are not voting; they are not persuading; nor are they preaching to the masses. They are hammering the world with very big hammers. If imposing one’s will from the top down does not remind you of the current occupant of the White House, then you have been living in a cave for the past eight months. The Czar and his Commissars are imposing their will on America every day, ramming legislation down the collective throat of America—legislation that Congress itself does not even read. And we are paying hundreds of billions of dollars, ceding our personal freedom, and witnessing the centralization of power in the federal government to an extent never before seen since we declared independence from the last dictator to rule America over two centuries ago. Are we being governed from the ground up—by the consent of the people? Or, is someone imposing their will upon us—hammering us from above?

More ominous still—the wolf in sheep’s clothing. Amazingly, the Fabian Window contains an image—just above the fellows hammering the world—that is as clear as it is foreboding: the socialists are wolves in sheep’s clothing. I often wonder why they did not choose a less ignoble animal. What about a courageous lion? A proud bull? A vigilant hawk? A noble horse? No, they chose a wolf—a cunning, ravenous, devious, and scary critter—and cloaked him in a sheepskin. Why? Because, as Lenin taught, if you want to operate in a capitalist society you must disguise yourself. Put the sheepskin on and you can easily mingle with the flock. Until you decide to shed the skin and consume the flock. The most frightening thing about the image is that the socialists make no apology about being wolves and living among sheep.

Jugears is certainly wielding a big hammer here - with the cooperation of CONgress, either willingly or unwittingly. Somehow, I cannot see critters like Pee-Lousy being important cogs in the New World Order - more likely scullery maids and the like.