SCOTUS makes a bad ruling

It's not bad enough that CONgress gave Disney and others a pass on the law that would have put a bunch of classics in the public domain - now this.
++++++++++++

Supreme Court Says Congress May Re-Copyright Public Domain Works

• 
  
• 
  
• 183
  inShare

• By David Kravets
• Email Author
• January 18, 2012 | 
• 1:56 pm |

Congress may take books, musical compositions and other works out of the public domain, where they can be freely used and adapted, and grant them copyright status again, the Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

In a 6-2 ruling, the court said that, just because material enters the public domain, it is not “territory that works may never exit.” (.pdf)

The top court was ruling on a petition by a group of orchestra conductors, educators, performers, publishers and film archivists who urged the justices to reverse an appellate court that ruled against the group, which has relied on artistic works in the public domain for their livelihoods.

They claimed that re-copyrighting public works would breach the speech rights of those who are now using those works without needing a license. There are millions of decades-old works at issue. Some of the well-known ones include H.G. Wells’ Things to Come; Fritz Lang’s Metropolis and the musical compositions of Igor Fyodorovich Stravinsky.

The court, however, was sympathetic to the plaintiffs’ argument. Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Ginsburg said “some restriction on expression is the inherent and intended effect of every grant of copyright.” But the top court, with Justice Elena Kagan recused, said Congress’ move to re-copyright the works to comport with an international treaty was more important.
++++++++++++
I thought we were supposed to make rulings and laws for the benefit of the American people - not to draw us into compliance with the European " Berne Convention".