I like this better than the sanitized version on the radio:
Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Prosser for Supreme Court
The Demonrats are doing a full-court press for Joanne Kloppenburg, as she will do their bidding on the Supreme Court. Right now, it's 4 conservatives to three liberals, so her getting elected would virtually end the success we have had so far in reversing all the liberal's excesses in the past.
Ms. Prosser has been rejected four times for a judgeship.
Vote Prosser, if you live in Wisconsin - or give the state back to the unions and Demonrats.
Ms. Prosser has been rejected four times for a judgeship.
Vote Prosser, if you live in Wisconsin - or give the state back to the unions and Demonrats.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Why is it the "working" people rally on a workday?
MoveOn wants us to rally on April 4th. Only trouble is - real working folks likely have jobs to go to that day:
++++++++++++++++
Dear MoveOn member,
+++++++++++++++++++++
Their grass has synthetic roots...and MLK was Republican, I read...he's probably rolling in his grave at the thought of these commies taking his name in vain. The workers he was supporting were truly oppressed, unlike their whining modern namesakes.
++++++++++++++++
Dear MoveOn member,
April 4, 2011 is shaping up to be one of the most important progressive days of action in nearly a decade.
It's the anniversary of the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., who was killed 43 years ago while traveling to Memphis to stand in solidarity with striking sanitation workers demanding their chance to attain the American Dream.
Now, in response to the new wave of Republican attacks on unions and working people, the entire labor movement has called for a massive national day of protests, vigils, and work site events on April 4. Virtually the entire progressive movement has joined in.
Can you help make next Monday an overwhelming day of solidarity for working people by attending an event in your area? Click here to find the April 4 event closest to you:
Working people in Wisconsin, Ohio, and Indiana have inspired an activist spirit that's spreading across the country, and this is our chance to keep the momentum going. This is our chance to stand up to the Republicans and demand protection for workers' rights and the restoration of the American Dream for all of us. The events are part of "We Are One," a grassroots effort led by a broad coalition of unions and progressive allies committed to realizing Dr. King's goal of economic justice for all. The events include actions, teach-ins, work site discussions, vigils, faith events, and more.
You can simply attend an event in your area or if you have creative ideas for an event in a public place like a park, in your work site, a teach-in at a college near you, or even something at your house, you can volunteer to host your own.
We need to keep building our strength until the American Dream can finally be attained by everyone. On April 4, we will keep the momentum going. And we will not stop.
Will you join us?
Thanks for all you do.
–Daniel, Justin, Julia, Robin, and the rest of the team +++++++++++++++++++++
Their grass has synthetic roots...and MLK was Republican, I read...he's probably rolling in his grave at the thought of these commies taking his name in vain. The workers he was supporting were truly oppressed, unlike their whining modern namesakes.
Chuckie Schumer wants my help!
The same Chuckie Schumer who wants to be able to ban people from ever owning a gun because of their ARREST record, not their actual criminal record, just sent me this:
Dear Chuck,

The Republicans are coming at us from every possible direction – health care, women’s freedom to choose, workers’ rights, environmental protection.
If I could choose anyone to be my partner in fighting these battles, it would be Kirsten Gillibrand.
Kirsten has proven herself to be a dogged defender of equal rights and committed to bringing relief to Americans who are struggling in this challenging economy. I know I can count on her to never back down, even in the face of extremist opponents.
All of us have benefited so much from having Kirsten in the U.S. Senate, so all of us need to do whatever we can to keep her there. Please join me in supporting Kirsten’s 2012 re-election bid by making a donation before the end-of-quarter deadline. She needs to raise $100,000 before March 31 so she can start this race in the best position possible.
Click here to make your donation to Kirsten’s campaign before March 31. This is the first important filing deadline for Kirsten, and she needs to make as strong a showing as possible.
It’s distressing to watch what the Republicans are doing. By attacking women’s reproductive rights, preventing collective bargaining and standing in the way of health care for all, they’re trying to demolish years and years of progress.
But even as some veer towards a dangerous radicalism, Kirsten sticks to her progressive principles. She doesn’t base her beliefs on anything except what she knows to be right and just. That’s why she’s staying the course on things such as marriage equality and freedom of choice.
We need to keep Kirsten in the Senate, but the only way we can is if all of us join together today. With your help we can show the pundits that the grassroots are behind Kirsten and she’s going to have the resources she needs to fight the tough battle ahead. The Republicans sure aren’t going to make it easy – so these early months are critical.
Click here to make your donation to Kirsten’s campaign before the crucial March 31 deadline. She needs to raise $100,000 so she’s well-prepared to take on the Republicans and win in 2012.
I think we can all agree that Kirsten has already done so much for the state of New York and America as a whole during her time in the Senate. I've no doubt she’ll continue that impressive record moving forward.
Sincerely,
Senator Chuck Schumer
++++++++++++++++
Kirsten Gillibrand is the dame who ran on a platform of being a gun-owner and pro gun rights, if I remember correctly - and since has found her true calling as one of Chuckie's sycophants. The only civil rights she is 100% behind involve killing people long before they could ever vote non-Demonrat, apparently. Call a spade a spade, Chuckie - it's not reproductive rights, it's ABORTION.
Personally, I think the Supreme Court overstepped their bounds in Roe vs. Wade, and that the federal government has no interest whatever in sex or reproduction - either pro or con. At the best, it should be a state's rights matter.
If enough people get elected and propose a Constitutional amendment defining person-hood beginning at birth, then there's a legal basis to outlaw it. I am fearful of any new federal law being enacted - any law at all - seeing the track record of our "legislators". Every law they have passed in the last 100 years or more has turned out to cause problems, or has been corrupted and warped away from its' original purpose.
Dear Chuck,

The Republicans are coming at us from every possible direction – health care, women’s freedom to choose, workers’ rights, environmental protection.
If I could choose anyone to be my partner in fighting these battles, it would be Kirsten Gillibrand.
Kirsten has proven herself to be a dogged defender of equal rights and committed to bringing relief to Americans who are struggling in this challenging economy. I know I can count on her to never back down, even in the face of extremist opponents.
All of us have benefited so much from having Kirsten in the U.S. Senate, so all of us need to do whatever we can to keep her there. Please join me in supporting Kirsten’s 2012 re-election bid by making a donation before the end-of-quarter deadline. She needs to raise $100,000 before March 31 so she can start this race in the best position possible.
Click here to make your donation to Kirsten’s campaign before March 31. This is the first important filing deadline for Kirsten, and she needs to make as strong a showing as possible.
It’s distressing to watch what the Republicans are doing. By attacking women’s reproductive rights, preventing collective bargaining and standing in the way of health care for all, they’re trying to demolish years and years of progress.
But even as some veer towards a dangerous radicalism, Kirsten sticks to her progressive principles. She doesn’t base her beliefs on anything except what she knows to be right and just. That’s why she’s staying the course on things such as marriage equality and freedom of choice.
We need to keep Kirsten in the Senate, but the only way we can is if all of us join together today. With your help we can show the pundits that the grassroots are behind Kirsten and she’s going to have the resources she needs to fight the tough battle ahead. The Republicans sure aren’t going to make it easy – so these early months are critical.
Click here to make your donation to Kirsten’s campaign before the crucial March 31 deadline. She needs to raise $100,000 so she’s well-prepared to take on the Republicans and win in 2012.
I think we can all agree that Kirsten has already done so much for the state of New York and America as a whole during her time in the Senate. I've no doubt she’ll continue that impressive record moving forward.
Sincerely,
Senator Chuck Schumer
++++++++++++++++
Kirsten Gillibrand is the dame who ran on a platform of being a gun-owner and pro gun rights, if I remember correctly - and since has found her true calling as one of Chuckie's sycophants. The only civil rights she is 100% behind involve killing people long before they could ever vote non-Demonrat, apparently. Call a spade a spade, Chuckie - it's not reproductive rights, it's ABORTION.
Personally, I think the Supreme Court overstepped their bounds in Roe vs. Wade, and that the federal government has no interest whatever in sex or reproduction - either pro or con. At the best, it should be a state's rights matter.
If enough people get elected and propose a Constitutional amendment defining person-hood beginning at birth, then there's a legal basis to outlaw it. I am fearful of any new federal law being enacted - any law at all - seeing the track record of our "legislators". Every law they have passed in the last 100 years or more has turned out to cause problems, or has been corrupted and warped away from its' original purpose.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Didn't miss Earth Hour this year
Last year, I missed it - too busy doing useful stuff to realize it was "Earth Hour". I really wanted to line up all the operable internal combustion powered vehicles here on the farm and have them idling, under the glare of every light on the property, but got too engrossed in coding and missed the chance.
This year, I had all the outside and lab lights on.
An article in the Ottawa Sun says it well.
So there.
Just wait for Earth Day.
This year, I had all the outside and lab lights on.
An article in the Ottawa Sun says it well.
So there.
Just wait for Earth Day.
Email to Herman Cain
Herman Cain has a website for his Presidential exploratory committee, and is requesting feedback. I had just watched this video - thanks, A Trainwreck in Maxwell - and wanted to share my childhood experience.
My email:
Mr. Cain,
Just saw the video of you talking about segregated water fountains. Thought you might like to hear my experience.
When I was maybe 10 - back in 1961 or '62 - my parents took me on a trip down south from Chicago. I had no idea what segregation was. We were in a store or mall - I remember seeing a wire cage with a chicken in it, and a coin slot, with a sign - 5 cents to see the chicken dance - the cage would shock the chicken, I guess - my Dad said it was cruel, so I never saw the performance.
Anyway, I was thirsty - and there were two water fountains nearby - "white" and "colored". I went up to the "colored" one, as I wanted to see what color the water was. It looked pretty clear to me.
My Dad rushed over to get me away from there, but did not explain - just told me not to do that any more.
That's my story. I never learned prejudice, could not see the logic in it. If you get to the primaries in Wisconsin, be assured you have my vote!
++++++++++++++
Well, that WOULD have been my email, except for the 250 character message limit - why don't they warn you in the web page or as you are typing? Truncated it:
++++++++++++++
Mr. Cain,
I would have shared my "colored water" experience from my youth, but the 250-character limit prevents it.
You have my vote!
++++++++++++++
Wouldn't it be neat if I get a reply and request for the rest of the message?
My email:
Mr. Cain,
Just saw the video of you talking about segregated water fountains. Thought you might like to hear my experience.
When I was maybe 10 - back in 1961 or '62 - my parents took me on a trip down south from Chicago. I had no idea what segregation was. We were in a store or mall - I remember seeing a wire cage with a chicken in it, and a coin slot, with a sign - 5 cents to see the chicken dance - the cage would shock the chicken, I guess - my Dad said it was cruel, so I never saw the performance.
Anyway, I was thirsty - and there were two water fountains nearby - "white" and "colored". I went up to the "colored" one, as I wanted to see what color the water was. It looked pretty clear to me.
My Dad rushed over to get me away from there, but did not explain - just told me not to do that any more.
That's my story. I never learned prejudice, could not see the logic in it. If you get to the primaries in Wisconsin, be assured you have my vote!
++++++++++++++
Well, that WOULD have been my email, except for the 250 character message limit - why don't they warn you in the web page or as you are typing? Truncated it:
++++++++++++++
Mr. Cain,
I would have shared my "colored water" experience from my youth, but the 250-character limit prevents it.
You have my vote!
++++++++++++++
Wouldn't it be neat if I get a reply and request for the rest of the message?
Saturday, March 26, 2011
The Coffee Can Rebellion
H/t Rivrdog
A "High Cap Freedom" Tactic:
A "High Cap Freedom" Tactic:
The Coffee Can Revolution
By L. Neil Smith
Go read.
I'm going to save for some of those Carolyn McCarthy special 33-rounders for my Glock 19...
Friday, March 25, 2011
Sometimes, they write themselves
Reading through the paper today, this jumped out at me:
Mar. 21, 2011 3:32 AM ET
USDA funds research on crops and climate change
STEVE KARNOWSKISTEVE KARNOWSKI, Associated Press
Mar. 21, 2011 3:32 AM ET
USDA funds research on crops and climate change
STEVE KARNOWSKISTEVE KARNOWSKI, Associated Press
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The federal government is investing $60 million in three major studies on the effects of climate change on crops and forests to help ensure farmers and foresters can continue producing food and timber while trying to limit the impact of a changing environment.
Further on in the article, we find out who will be in charge of these studies.
The corn project will be led by a rural sociologist, Lois Wright Morton of Iowa State University.
Tim Martin, a professor of tree physiology at the University of Florida is the head of the forestry project.
The leader of the wheat project is Sanford Eigenbrode, an entomologist at the University of Idaho.
Of the three, the only one I see as remotely qualified to lead an agricultural research project is Mr. Martin. At least the forestry project is led by someone with a degree in a tree related science.
What, exactly, is a "rural sociologist', and how does this relate to growing corn? Fertility rites? The frequency of farmers "shuckin' them dirty ol' work clothes off"? Looks to me like she will be studying the study participants, not doing anything useful towards getting crops to grow.
Entomologists study insects. OK, I get it - insects affect crops. But the AP quote for him involves the amount of carbon that grain crops "sequester" and how much nitrous oxide is released by fertilizer use.
Leave it to our government to spend $60,000,000 of our money and choose people apparently unqualified to lead the projects. Also, to misstate the aims of many of the studies. If they are so concerned on getting crops to grow in changing climates, why the emphasis on "greenhouse gases" that may or may not be important?
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
One strike and you're out!
Schumer's at it again. From The Daily Caller:
Get collared years ago on a bogus drug charge because the oregano in your back pocket looked like was a bag of weed? Or maybe a judge back in 2006 dropped those charges because you were able to provide proof for that Adderall prescription? Under proposed legislation, it will not matter if you were innocent all along or even proven innocent by a court of law.
Either way, you can forget about buying a gun.
The Fix Gun Checks Act of 2011 would greatly expand the definition of those legally prohibited from owning firearms to include anyone who’s ever been arrested — even if never convicted or found guilty — for drug possession within a five-year period. The legislation is certainly troubling for those who want a “common sense” debate about drug decriminalization. And it would seem fears that any new national gun-control legislation would be used to limit the gun-rights of law-abiding citizens is at least partially justified.
Sponsored by New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer and introduced earlier this month, the expanded background checks bill includes a “clarification of the definition of drug abusers and drug addicts who are prohibited from possessing firearms.” Under Schumer’s bill, the definition of a “drug abuser” would include anyone with “an arrest for the use or possession of a controlled substance within the past 5 years.”
Current federal law already specifies that two kinds of drug users can be barred from owning a gun: (1) Those who have been convicted of possessing or using a controlled substance in the past year and (2) Anyone who has had multiple drug arrests in the past five years, including one within a year of applying for a firearm, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
New gun-control legislation would prohibit those arrested but not convicted of drug crimes from possessing firearms
By Jeff Winkler | Published: 12:39 AM 03/23/2011
Get collared years ago on a bogus drug charge because the oregano in your back pocket looked like was a bag of weed? Or maybe a judge back in 2006 dropped those charges because you were able to provide proof for that Adderall prescription? Under proposed legislation, it will not matter if you were innocent all along or even proven innocent by a court of law.
Either way, you can forget about buying a gun.
The Fix Gun Checks Act of 2011 would greatly expand the definition of those legally prohibited from owning firearms to include anyone who’s ever been arrested — even if never convicted or found guilty — for drug possession within a five-year period. The legislation is certainly troubling for those who want a “common sense” debate about drug decriminalization. And it would seem fears that any new national gun-control legislation would be used to limit the gun-rights of law-abiding citizens is at least partially justified.
Sponsored by New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer and introduced earlier this month, the expanded background checks bill includes a “clarification of the definition of drug abusers and drug addicts who are prohibited from possessing firearms.” Under Schumer’s bill, the definition of a “drug abuser” would include anyone with “an arrest for the use or possession of a controlled substance within the past 5 years.”
Current federal law already specifies that two kinds of drug users can be barred from owning a gun: (1) Those who have been convicted of possessing or using a controlled substance in the past year and (2) Anyone who has had multiple drug arrests in the past five years, including one within a year of applying for a firearm, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
Read the whole thing.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Ben Stein in The American Spectator
Couldn't have said it better.
It was buried in a private ceremony by Mr. Barack Obama of Chicago as he silently signed America on to the One World Government some of us have been worried about for decades.
Look at it this way: Where did Mr. Obama get the authority to commit United States forces to war in Libya? There was no declaration of war. There was no authorizing resolution by Congress allowing money to be spent on a war against Col. Gaddafi. As far as I know, there was no meeting of Mr. Obama and top leaders of Congress to discuss the subject in even rough form, let alone detail. There was no lengthy buildup in which the Congress was "allowed" to express the people's opinion on whether we want to be in a third concurrent war.
Go read. It's good.
Isn't it way past time we got the US out of the United Nations?
One World Government Obama
By Ben Stein on 3.22.11 @ 6:09AM
Maybe I missed something, but wasn't that The Constitution of the United States of America that we just laid to rest this weekend?It was buried in a private ceremony by Mr. Barack Obama of Chicago as he silently signed America on to the One World Government some of us have been worried about for decades.
Look at it this way: Where did Mr. Obama get the authority to commit United States forces to war in Libya? There was no declaration of war. There was no authorizing resolution by Congress allowing money to be spent on a war against Col. Gaddafi. As far as I know, there was no meeting of Mr. Obama and top leaders of Congress to discuss the subject in even rough form, let alone detail. There was no lengthy buildup in which the Congress was "allowed" to express the people's opinion on whether we want to be in a third concurrent war.
Go read. It's good.
Isn't it way past time we got the US out of the United Nations?
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Oh, the horror!
CREDO is at it again. This time, we've got a real reason to go back to living in caves!
![]() |
Tell the EPA: Fight mercury, arsenic and other toxic air pollution.
Dear Chuck, It only takes a little mercury to cause a lot of death, cancer and brain damage. But every year, coal-fired power plants alone pump 50 tons of this potent neurotoxin into our air. Mercury exposure is so widespread in this country that as many as 1 in 6 women of childbearing age has mercury levels in her blood high enough to put a baby at risk of mercury poisoning,1 But mercury has been totally unregulated by the Clean Air Act, until now. The EPA just announced a significant rule to reduce emissions of mercury, arsenic, led, dioxins, acid gas, and six dozen other toxic chemicals that power plants are now able to freely dump into our air. It's the most important clean air rule since the Clean Air Act was updated in 1990 — and the EPA is predictably under tremendous pressure by the coal industry and other polluters to weaken it. Tell the EPA you support this landmark rule to significantly reduce mercury, arsenic, lead and other toxic air pollution. Submit a public comment now. For decades, the electric industry has successfully fought requirements to reduce these toxics. They've kept releasing mercury into the air, where it finds its way into the vast majority of our lakes and waterways, into our fish, and then into our bodies, where the poison accumulates, causing deadly disease and impairing fundamental brain functions like the ability to walk, talk, read, write and learn. Now we have a chance to change that. According to the EPA, reduced emissions from this new air toxics rule will save as many as 17,000 American lives every year by 2015, and will prevent up to 120,000 cases of childhood asthma. Submit a public comment to defend this live-saving clean air rule. These health benefits will also provide tremendous monetary benefits of between $60 billion to $140 billion annually, at a substantially lower cost of less than $11 billion for the polluters.2 With no sense of irony, polluters claim this is too expensive a cost for them to bear — as they reap billions of dollars in profit and heap substantially higher health costs onto the public. But the cost of the new regulations is a bargain, and the requirements are very reasonable: power plants have four years to install or upgrade to technology that already exists and is in use at many power plants nationwide. As we have seen with the repeated attacks on the Clean Air Act's ability to regulate climate pollution, industry efforts to weaken this air toxics rule will be fierce, and these powerful utilities have many friends in the congress who are more than happy to do this dirty work. We need to display a massive show of support to encourage the EPA to keep this landmark rule as strong as possible. CREDO is standing with numerous other environmental organizations to deliver many hundreds of thousands of comments to the EPA. Please add your voice now. Tell the EPA: Don't bow to industry pressure. Keep the air toxics rule strong. Submit your public comment now. Thank you for fighting for clean air. Elijah Zarlin, Campaign Manager CREDO Action from Working Assets 1. "Protect our kids from toxic mercury," CNN, March 17th, 2011 2. "EPA's Mercury and Air Toxics Rule: Bottom Lines and Background," NRDC, March 16th, 2011 Power plant emissions are highly regulated now. 99.99% reduction in particulates and other emissions isn't good enough for these people - 101% might start to placate them. A big lie - that mercury emissions are unregulated. I can't even buy mercury to show my grandkids the wonders of science without governmental permission. It would be great if shutting down our coal plants - a huge proportion of our power generating capacity - might actually have an effect on airborne mercury and lead - but with China pumping out a new coal-fired plant every few weeks, it won't do squat... By the way, greenies, how much mercury are you forcing into our HOMES with your "green" CFL made in China disasters? |
New emails from Twitter!
I'm so happy to be noticed! I can't wait to readed my new tweets!
First Four Showdown: USC vs. VCU - Cover The Number
Click this link:
http://twitter.com/account/confirm_email/ckuecker/33333-3333A-801364
Once you confirm, all future email from Twitter will be sent to this address.
Climate change is real, humans cause it, and we must act - ABC Online
Click this link:
http://twitter.com/account/confirm_email/ckuecker/EF6E8-059E8-928685
Once you confirm, all future email from Twitter will be sent to this address.
Hi, ckuecker
You have 4 unreaded message(s) from Twitter.First Four Showdown: USC vs. VCU - Cover The Number
Click this link:
http://twitter.com/account/confirm_email/ckuecker/33333-3333A-801364
Once you confirm, all future email from Twitter will be sent to this address.
The Twitter Team
If you received this message in error and did not sign up for a Twitter account, click not my account.
Please do not reply to this message; it was sent from an unmonitored email address. This message is a service email related to your use of Twitter. For general inquiries or to request support with your Twitter account, please visit us at Twitter Support.
Hi, ckuecker
You have 6 information message(s) from Twitter.Climate change is real, humans cause it, and we must act - ABC Online
Click this link:
http://twitter.com/account/confirm_email/ckuecker/EF6E8-059E8-928685
Once you confirm, all future email from Twitter will be sent to this address.
The Twitter Team
If you received this message in error and did not sign up for a Twitter account, click not my account.
Please do not reply to this message; it was sent from an unmonitored email address. This message is a service email related to your use of Twitter. For general inquiries or to request support with your Twitter account, please visit us at Twitter Support.
The only problem is that all the links go to shady domains in 'cz', and I don't have a twitter account.
It's good to know, however, that climate change is real. I was worried that Algore had slipped from godhood...
Friday, March 18, 2011
Obama trying to cripple Japan?
Karl Denninger thinks so:
From the BBC:
Am I reading this right?
Our government demanded that the Japanese dismantle - that is, permanently remove - over five gigawatts of power in order to help them with a critical safety problem that had the potential to destroy 100 square miles of land and kill or injure thousands of people?
That as compensation for helping them we demanded that they cripple their electrical generating capacity on a permanent basis?
You have to be kidding me.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Read the whole thing. If true, I definitely agree with the impeachment part - the dismantling of illegal federal agencies goes without saying...
2226: The Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper, quoting a senior official of the ruling Democratic Party of Japan, said the US made the offer immediately after the disaster damaged Fukushima No 1 nuclear plant. According to the unnamed senior official, US support was based on dismantling the troubled reactors run by Tokyo Electric Power (TEPCO) some 250 km (155 miles) northeast of Tokyo. However, the government and TEPCO thought the cooling system could be restored by themselves, the report said.(Another source: http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Asia/Story/STIStory_646444.html)
Am I reading this right?
Our government demanded that the Japanese dismantle - that is, permanently remove - over five gigawatts of power in order to help them with a critical safety problem that had the potential to destroy 100 square miles of land and kill or injure thousands of people?
That as compensation for helping them we demanded that they cripple their electrical generating capacity on a permanent basis?
You have to be kidding me.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Read the whole thing. If true, I definitely agree with the impeachment part - the dismantling of illegal federal agencies goes without saying...
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Email from Herb Kohl

| Home Biography News Issues & Legislation Constituent Services Contact Senator Kohl Unsubscribe |
The United States has the safest food supply in the world. Yet, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that one out of every six Americans are affected by food-borne illnesses each year – costing the health care system an estimated $88 billion according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
This highlights the need for an even stronger food safety system. Guarding our food supply cannot just be passed on to states and local governments or left to private industry. Protecting public health is an inherent function of the federal government. Consumers should be confident that the food they purchase at the grocery store is safe and will not cause harm to their families.
Over the last week we examined important policy and fiscal questions at two Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee hearings held to review the President’s fiscal year 2012 budget request. I used these hearings to ask Agriculture Secretary Vilsack and FDA Commissioner Hamburg about the President’s proposed funding requests for food safety. I asked whether these increases are necessary at this time given the mounting federal deficit.
Every dollar of taxpayer money that we spend must be questioned, defended, and well thought out. We must ask whether or not we can do more with less, but we must not jeopardize public health. The way our food is produced is becoming more complex every day, so we need our food safety agencies to have the ability to adapt to these changes.
As we prepare to write the fiscal year 2012 spending bills, I will work closely with our food safety agencies to make sure we are protecting public health and being good stewards of your taxpayer money.
Sincerely,


+++++++++++++++++++++++++
It's good to see he's willing to consider how much something will cost us before he votes to spend our money, isn't it?
Email to my state Senator
Senator Cullen,
I stand beside my earlier email, where I questioned the cowardly way you and your compatriots ran away rather than face the fact that you are now in the minority.
However, I have to say that I am pleased that you have returned and are proposing amending the Wisconsin Constitution to eliminate the requirement for a 20-Senator quorum for budgetary issues.
Perhaps in the future, we won't have to read about "fleebaggers".
Regards,
Chuck Kuecker
I stand beside my earlier email, where I questioned the cowardly way you and your compatriots ran away rather than face the fact that you are now in the minority.
However, I have to say that I am pleased that you have returned and are proposing amending the Wisconsin Constitution to eliminate the requirement for a 20-Senator quorum for budgetary issues.
Perhaps in the future, we won't have to read about "fleebaggers".
Regards,
Chuck Kuecker
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Union thugs at it again
At Legal Insurrection (H/t Ace of Spades)
If you can't abide the will of the people, just invoke "democracy" (mob rule) and wreck stuff.
Lots more at the source
Recall Jim Holperin
Thugs Destroy Recall Petitions
If you can't abide the will of the people, just invoke "democracy" (mob rule) and wreck stuff.
Lots more at the source
Recall Jim Holperin
Thugs Destroy Recall Petitions
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Monday, March 14, 2011
Support Verizon, boycott Ben & Jerry's!
Just got this neat email from "CREDO", a lefty-liberal outfit I keep an eye on:
Like CREDO doesn't "throw it's weight around" supporting causes that most Americans find disturbing or evil?
Please, someone, tell me where anyone in the federal government is trying to "redefine rape"?
HOW VERIZON HAS SUPPORTED THE RIGHT WING — AND WHY YOU SHOULD SWITCH TO CREDOWhy did Verizon Wireless sign on as a major sponsor of The Daily, the new iPad-only "newspaper" from Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. — the company that brought us Fox News and gave a whopping $1 million to the Republican Governors Association?Maybe Verizon is so steeped in business-as-usual that it will cozy up to the likes of Murdoch. And maybe Verizon and Apple — which joined forces to offer the iPhone to Verizon customers — think Murdoch and Fox News are "fair and balanced" media. CREDO Mobile sees Fox News for what it is: a vehicle for ultra-conservative propaganda. CREDO would never do business with the makers of Fox News. Unlike CREDO, Verizon plays the insider game in Washington and ends up donating money to right-wing politicians:
Since 1985, CREDO has raised more than $65 million for progressive nonprofits like Planned Parenthood, Doctors Without Borders, Earthjustice and the ACLU. And we fight for change through our CREDO Action network of 1.9 million activists. When you join CREDO Mobile, you'll get everything you expect from a mobile phone company — plus a whole lot more. Sign up today and get:*
|
Like CREDO doesn't "throw it's weight around" supporting causes that most Americans find disturbing or evil?
Please, someone, tell me where anyone in the federal government is trying to "redefine rape"?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
