Day by Day Cartoon by Chris Muir

Monday, October 3, 2011

Exterminate Republicans

Got this link off a list. Here's the screen shot, in case they try to send it to the memory hole:
+++++++++++++++++++++


Notice the ad for "Stop Scott Walker". They can't propose a radical "solution" to the problem that the large majority of Americans oppose their agenda without tossing in a little gratuitous gun control.

Text of the original post:

Exterminate Republicans

Not physically, as despotic regimes have tried to do many times throughout history. That form of control is crude, callous, and ultimately self-defeating. The extermination that I propose is of a different sort.

Republicans and their enablers need to be shunned, both economically and socially. The idea that these people can be a part of our civilized society is frankly, ludicrous, and the sooner that we disabuse ourselves of that ridiculous notion, the better off all of us will be.

I'm talking about a total boycott of Republicans, both economically and socially. Refuse to interact with anyone who you know to be a Rightist in any fashion so far as is feasible. We need to make it clear to all of them that their beliefs and the behavior that grows out of those beliefs is totally, 100% unacceptable. We need to make their lives as unpleasant as possible in order to restore sanity to our national discourse. Don't do business with them, don't acquiesce to their insanity out of some misguided sense of decorum, hell, don't even speak to them insofar as that's possible.

They think that they're the movers and shakers of the world? They want to "go Galt"? Let them prove it, without any assistance from anyone other than their own kind.

Cretins like the Kochs would be far less powerful, even with their vast fortunes, if nobody other than a Republican would even speak to them. Yes, I admit that my proposal is very radical, and that no tangible results would be seen for a long time even in the best of cases, but we have tried everything else, and nothing has worked. We must establish that we will have nothing to do with any of them so long as they continue to attempt to destroy the United States of America.

"But," you might protest, "my uncle (husband, wife, nephew, cousin, etc.) is a Republican! I can't just cut them out of my life!"

That attitude is what enables them to continue to persist in their abhorrent ways. We make it too easy for them to live and believe as they do. Aside from retaining employment, there is no valid reason to interact with a Rightist on any level, and were the economy in better shape, even that would cease to be a justification for having anything whatsoever to do with any of them. If you are willing to tolerate their insanity, willing to go along to get along, willing to continue to allow them to hijack our political process for their own nefarious ends that damage us all, then you are scarcely better than they are.

The Amish have a practice called shunning, in which nobody in the community will interact with the shunned for any reason. This is what I suggest, on a much larger scale, and for a very noble cause; the very survival of this country, which is imperiled every day that we continue to allow them to attempt to destroy us. It is not just the Rightist politicians that are the problem. Indeed, they are only the instruments of the poisonous ideology that permeates the minds of their followers. You can't kill an idea, and you can't morally kill those who possess that idea, but you can cut off all support that continues to allow the idea to persist. And if we lack the fortitude to do this very thing, that idea
will eventually kill *us*.

The choice is yours: Exterminate Republicans, or they will, sooner or later, exterminate you.

+++++++++++++++++++++

My God, they are tiresome in repeating "Koch Koch Koch"! How many American jobs not directly concerned with spreading leftist propaganda do cretins like Al Gore provide, anyway?


"Aside from retaining employment, there is no valid reason to interact with a Rightist on any level, and were the economy in better shape, even that would cease to be a justification for having anything whatsoever to do with any of them." A tacit admission that "rightist policies" make the country run. Let's not bite the hand that feeds us until we are on top - then the guillotine can make its' appearance.

He's got one thing right - this is a battle to the death - either of freedom and the American way of life, or of socialism and total government control of humanity. We must win.

Here's my version.

Exterminate Democrats
   
Not physically, as despotic regimes have tried to do many times throughout history. That form of control is crude, callous, and ultimately self-defeating. The extermination that I propose is of a different sort.

Democrats and their enablers need to be shunned, both economically and socially. The idea that these people can be a part of our civilized society is frankly, ludicrous, and the sooner that we disabuse ourselves of that ridiculous notion, the better off all of us will be.

I'm talking about a total boycott of Democrats, both economically and socially. Refuse to interact with anyone who you know to be a Leftist in any fashion so far as is feasible. We need to make it clear to all of them that their beliefs and the behavior that grows out of those beliefs is totally, 100% unacceptable. We need to make their lives as unpleasant as possible in order to restore sanity to our national discourse. Don't do business with them, don't acquiesce to their insanity out of some misguided sense of decorum, hell, don't even speak to them insofar as that's possible.

They think that they're the movers and shakers of the world? They want to "go Green"? Let them prove it, without any assistance from anyone other than their own kind.

Cretins like Soros would be far less powerful, even with their vast fortunes, if nobody other than a Democrat would even speak to them. Yes, I admit that my proposal is very radical, and that no tangible results would be seen for a long time even in the best of cases, but we have tried everything else, and nothing has worked. We must establish that we will have nothing to do with any of them so long as they continue to attempt to destroy the United States of America.

"But," you might protest, "my uncle (husband, wife, nephew, cousin, etc.) is a Democrat! I can't just cut them out of my life!"

That attitude is what enables them to continue to persist in their abhorrent ways. We make it too easy for them to live and believe as they do. There is no valid reason to interact with a Leftist on any level. If you are willing to tolerate their insanity, willing to go along to get along, willing to continue to allow them to hijack our political process for their own nefarious ends that damage us all, then you are scarcely better than they are.

The Amish have a practice called shunning, in which nobody in the community will interact with the shunned for any reason. This is what I suggest, on a much larger scale, and for a very noble cause; the very survival of this country, which is imperiled every day that we continue to allow them to attempt to destroy us. It is not just the Leftist politicians that are the problem. Indeed, they are only the instruments of the poisonous ideology that permeates the minds of their followers. You can't kill an idea, and you can't morally kill those who possess that idea, but you can cut off all support that continues to allow the idea to persist. And if we lack the fortitude to do this very thing, that idea
will eventually kill *us*.

The choice is yours: Exterminate Democrats, or they will, sooner or later, exterminate you.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Important message from MoveOn

Just got this:
++++++++++++++++++
Dear MoveOn member,
Over the last two weeks, an amazing wave of protest against Wall Street and the big banks has erupted across the country.
In Seattle, San Francisco, Ohio, and Boston (where 3,000 people rallied),1 grassroots groups have shut down banks and held sit-ins to demand that giant banks pay their fair share of taxes, end the foreclosure crisis, and create jobs.
In financial centers like Chicago and Atlanta, hundreds of people have set up encampments in front of major financial institutions for round-the-clock demonstrations.
Outside Los Angeles, community members have been running a 24-hour vigil around the home of Rose Gudiel, who faces eviction after getting foreclosed on for being two weeks late on a mortgage payment after her younger brother was murdered.2
But the biggest protests are on Wall Street itself. "Occupy Wall Street," which began with a brave group of young people, has swelled to thousands of students, unemployed folks, union members, and others who have persevered through intense police harassment and mass arrests to sustain a rolling 24-hour-a-day protest against the bankers who've wrecked our economy and undermined our democracy.3
On Wednesday, MoveOn members will join labor and community groups in New York City for a huge march down to the protest site—the biggest yet.

And because we can't all be in New York, we're going to stage a massive "Virtual March on Wall Street" online with our friends at Rebuild the Dream. Together, we'll add hundreds of thousands of voices of solidarity from the American Dream Movement for the protests across the country and show just how widespread outrage at the Wall Street banks really is.
Click here to sign up to join the Virtual March on Wall Street this Wednesday
The protests on Wall Street have been running for two weeks straight and are only getting bigger every day. The signs, placards, and chants focus on standing up for what the protesters are calling "the 99%" of us who are suffering while Wall Street bankers grow richer by the day.
In a telling moment last week, a group of bankers even went so far as to mock the protests while sipping champagne from balconies overlooking thousands of people marching down Wall Street.4
But adding mockery to the callous disregard for our country that we've seen from the big banks isn't slowing down the Occupy Wall Street movement one bit. The protests on Wall Street are set to grow even more this week and solidarity actions are already planned in dozens more cities.
You can see what's planned in your area by visiting the solidarity site Occupy Together: http://www.moveon.org/r?r=264645&id=31654-10080683-S4MsSTx&t=3
And you can sign up to add your voice to the national "Virtual March on Wall Street" online here: http://www.civic.moveon.org/joinvirtualwallstreet/?id=31654-10080683-S4MsSTx&t=4
Thanks for all you do.
–Justin, Robin, Peter, Elena, and the rest of the team
Sources:
1. "BofA's Boston Building Draws Protesters; 21 Arrests Are Made," bloomberg.com, September 30, 2011
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=264642&id=31654-10080683-S4MsSTx&t=5
2. "La Puente Family Fights Eviction from Foreclosed Home," KTLA.com, September 29, 2011
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=264643&id=31654-10080683-S4MsSTx&t=6
3. "Anti-Wall Street Protestors Vow to Keep Up Fight," Reuters, October 2, 2011
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=264644&id=31654-10080683-S4MsSTx&t=7
4. "Occupy Wall Street Protestors Meet Champagne Sippers," abcnews.com, September 30, 2011
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=264649&id=31654-10080683-S4MsSTx&t=8
++++++++++++++++++
*Notice all the footnotes refer back to a trustworthy source - MoveOn.org.


Do they mean "giant banks" like those that helped elect Osama should "pay their fair share of taxes, end the foreclosure crisis, and create jobs"?

Let's think about this for a bit.

"Fair share of taxes". What is "fair"? Roseanne's limit on wealth? 100%?

"End the foreclosure crisis" - would that be the crisis caused by speculating on property until the bubble burst, leaving so many - including me - underwater? The crisis begun by President Clinton forcing banks to make loans to people without the means to repay?

Please - someone explain to me how banks "create jobs" after you make them pay their "fair share of taxes"? Jobs can only be created by a healthy market that creates demand for manufacturing and services, not by waving a magic wand.

"Undermined our democracy"? America is NOT a democracy. The problem is that CONgress thinks we are.

These mopes have their heads on backwards - where they ought to be picketing is in front of the White House and CONgress, because those buildings house the people who worked so hard to get us where we are today, economically. Especially those whose logo is a bold capital 'D' in a toilet bowl.

Interview with Herman Cain


+++++++++++++++++++
Seen at Domestic Divapalooza.

I agree with Angela - we don't need a politician in the White House - or in any position in our government!

Another video she posted:

 

The downfall of America

I thought I had posted this before, but can't find it. So, here it is:
+++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++
Found at  http://www.therightscoop.com/open-thread-grinding-america-down/

Idiot box?

TV can drive you nuts:
++++++++++++++++++++

'The X Factor could cause mental problems’

The X Factor is 'playing fast and loose with people's minds', according to the distinguished mental health campaigner Marjorie Wallace. 

It is Britain’s most popular television programme, but The X Factor has been accused of risking mental illness among some of its contestants by Marjorie Wallace.
The chief executive of Sane, the mental health charity, says the talent show created by Simon Cowell is “playing fast and loose with people’s minds”.
She tells Mandrake: “It is like 'conditioning experiments’ that took place in the Sixties on animals to see what combination of reward and punishment would drive them crazy. These reality programmes are in some ways repeating these outlawed experiments and this isn’t psychological research, it is entertainment.”

++++++++++++++++++++
Has anyone done a study on what prolonged exposure to MSM "news" reporting does to people?

OFC!

I'm a connoisseur of fried chicken, but I think I'll pass on this:
++++++++++++++++

It's Obama Fried Chicken! OFC pops up in China... but can the President also match the secret recipe of Colonel Sanders?

By Mike O'brien

Last updated at 6:49 AM on 1st October 2011

Is Obama abandoning his bid for a second term in the White House and is giving Colonel Sanders a run for his money by opening a chain of fried chicken joints?
Now that's change you can't really believe in.

But in Beijing, China, a restaurant is actually calling itself OFC with a logo that looks alarmingly like the President dressed in the colonel's clothes.
Scroll down for video
The presidential eatery: The Obama Fried Chicken restaurant in Beijing
The presidential eatery: The Obama Fried Chicken restaurant in Beijing
smiling
sanders
Broad smiles: President Obama and the original master of Southern Fried Chicken Colonel Sanders
The catchphrase underneath, apparently says 'We’re so cool, aren’t we?'

++++++++++++++++
He certainly has fans in Red China, I'll say that. Cheering for a true comrade!

KFC has gone downhill in the last few years - actually, I haven't patronized them since I got sick after eating there a few years back. Don't know it was their food, but their current menu and pricing certainly turns me off.

Let's apply this to celebrities!

All celebrities who have more than the current PC amount of wealth need to heed this. What's sauce for the goose...

I would settle for public floggings for people like this, though. Picture the scene in the original "Hunchback of Notre Dame" where Quasimodo gets it. Tickets could be sold, with proceeds going to pay off the national debt.

+++++++++++++++++++++ 

Roseanne says guilty bankers should be beheaded

Saturday, October 01, 2011
Comedienne and actress Roseanne Barr had a strong message for bankers who contributed to the economic crisis: Return the profits or be beheaded. 

The comedienne and self-proclaimed presidential candidate appeared on the RT television program "Keiser Report" and said if she were president, she would bring back the guillotine as a form of capital punishment for the "worst of the worst of the guilty."

"I, first, would allow the guilty bankers to pay back anything over $100 million (in) personal wealth, because I believe in the maximum wealth of $100 million," Barr said. "If they're unable to live on that amount, they should go to re-education camps. And if that doesn't work, they should be beheaded."
+++++++++++++++++++++
'RT' is Russia Today.

I know Rosie O'Donnell was a leftie, but not Roseanne. Hollywood will do that, I guess.
Live and learn.

H/t Ace of Spades

Behind "blue" eyes

First I've heard of it

Who the hell is WAVE? Go to the website and see what PSH looks like.

80% of businesses in states with CCW bar their customers from carrying? I don't think so. They want the patronage, and most business owners are intelligent people who understand that armed customers are not dangers to them - quite the opposite.

Why would any business owner want to alienate a fair number of prospective customers?

 Found at Days of our Trailers 

+++++++++++++++++

Businesses asked to ban guns

by Andrew Beckett on July 28, 2011

The law that legalizes carrying a concealed weapon in Wisconsin is set to take effect later this year, but Jeri Bonavia of the Wisconsin Anti-Violence Effort says her groups is not backing off on its opposition to the measure.

The group is encouraging businesses to take a stand. Bonavia says they are calling on businesses to ban guns from being carried inside. She says similar steps have been taken by about 80-percent of the businesses in other states that allow concealed carry.

The law allows permit holders to carry hidden weapons inside a business, unless signs are posted saying they are banned. Bonavia says WAVE plans to run a statewide campaign urging businesses to put those signs up.

The law takes effect on November 1st.
AUDIO: Andrew Beckett reports (1:10)
John Colbert, WIBA contributed to this report.
+++++++++++++
The law takes effect November first, but I still am waiting for the agencies involved to tell us exactly what the training requirements will be. 

 

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Free speech!

wwltv.com
Posted on September 28, 2011 at 2:29 PM
Updated Thursday, Sep 29 at 10:39 AM


Maya Rodriguez / Eyewitness News

NEW ORLEANS -- There are several political signs attracting all kinds of attention in one Uptown neighborhood.

On Wednesday, crowds gathered at the corner of Calhoun and Coralie streets, looking at several signs depicting President Barack Obama as either a dunce, a puppet or a crying baby in a diaper.

"It disrespects the nation -- and President Barack Obama represents our nation," said Skip Alexander, as he looked at one of the signs. "He represents everybody, not some people."
++++++++++++++++++
And Osama bowing down to every tin-pot dictator DOES respect America?

He sure as hell does not represent me. At best, he represents what Americans get when Americans do not pay attention to their responsibilities and vote intelligently.

Go to the site and watch the video - especially the council member discussing how she will search for a "legal" means to get the signs removed, as soon as she can find a loophole that does not appear to violate the First Amendment.

Glock strip-tease!

She demonstrates good gun safety, too.

 

Passing of a great man

I never thought much about the beginnings of the Vishay resistor company - it was just a manufacturer of precision, stable resistors that I used in many designs.

Just got this link to the story of Vishay's founder, Felix Zandman, from a list I subscribe to.

A great mind has gone, but the world is a better place for his work.

Economic reality

An AP article on the front page of the Beloit paper this morning mentions "the recession that ended two years ago".

What planet is the Associated Press reporting on? On Earth, here in the United States, we are getting deeper into the depression that began, for me at least, when the housing bubble Clinton set in motion burst, that Mr. Osama has fueled with his profligate borrowing, printing of money, and cancerous growth of bureaucracy.

Of course, "depression" is such a depressing and non-PC word. I can see why they avoid it. Still, the non-stop reporting of the light at the end of the tunnel is getting real old.

BATFEIEIO -Gone?

It could happen -
+++++++++++++

Bombshell: DOJ Considering Elimination of ATF

 
Multiple sources, including sources from ATF, DOJ  and Congressional offices have said there is a white paper circulating within the Department of Justice, outlining the essential elimination of ATF.
 According to sources, the paper outlines the firing of at least 450 ATF agents in an effort to conduct damage control as Operation Fast and Furious gets uglier and as election day 2012 gets closer.  ATF agents wouldn’t be reassigned to other positions, just simply let go. Current duties of ATF, including the enforcement of explosives and gun laws, would be transferred to other agencies, possibly the FBI and the DEA.  According to a congressional source, there have been rumblings about the elimination of ATF for quite sometime, but the move would require major political capital to actually happen.

“It’s a serious white paper being circulated, how far they’d get with it I don’t know,” a confidential source said.

After a town hall meeting about Operation Fast and Furious in Tucson, Ariz. on Monday, ATF Whistleblower Vince Cefalu, who has been key in exposing details about Operation Fast and Furious, confirmed the elimination of ATF has been circulating as a serious idea for sometime now and that a white paper outlining the plan does exist.
+++++++++++++
So, ATF goes away, but the "duties" get transferred to other departments - in other words, "meet he new boss, same as the old boss".

The ATF needs to go away - true. This means abolished, not shuffled around. 450 fired "agents" is a good start, but likely right after the reorganization, 900 new staffers would be hired in the bureaus taking over the "duties" of the old ATF.

Smoke and mirrors.

Free speech on campus?

Not so much. Found this link through a post at Borepatch - FIRE

I believe there should be zero public funding for universities that oppress free speech or any other inalienable right, such as the right to self-defense.

Right here in Wisconsin:

+++++++++++++++++

UW-Stout Chancellor Doubles Down on Censorship of 'Firefly' and Anti-Fascism Posters

September 28, 2011


MINNEAPOLIS, Sept. 28, 2011—The chancellor of University of Wisconsin-Stout (UWS) has declared that he will not defend faculty First Amendment rights from censorship. UWS censored theater professor James Miller's poster featuring a line from actor Nathan Fillion's character in Joss Whedon's television series Firefly. Campus police threatened Miller with criminal disorderly conduct charges, and he was reported to the "threat assessment team." After UWS censored his second poster, which stated, "Warning: Fascism," Miller came to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) for help. In the midst of FIRE's national campaign to restore faculty rights at UWS, the university is standing by its absurd claim that both posters were "implied threat[s] of violence."

+++++++++++++++++

This crap has to stop.

Crowder on health