Nothing new here - but one thing stood out in her beg:
"Unlike our opponents and the GOP establishment, we don’t have a bunch of
conservative mega-millionaires lining up to write us checks. We depend
on grassroots donations from people like you. Yes, all of, you."
So, George Soros and friends do not qualify as mega-millionaires?
Showing posts with label Tammy G. Baldwin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tammy G. Baldwin. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
Monday, July 31, 2017
Tammy's in trouble!
Just got another frantic email from Tammy Gay.
The operative sentence:
Republicans in Wisconsin are raising all kinds of cash. They've outraised Democrats 50 to 1.
Damn well about time - I hope this is a harbinger for 2018...
The operative sentence:
Republicans in Wisconsin are raising all kinds of cash. They've outraised Democrats 50 to 1.
Damn well about time - I hope this is a harbinger for 2018...
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Correspondence with Tammy Gay
Just got this from Tammy Gay:
Reply:
By the way - Jugearscare cost me and my wife over $13,000 last year, for "insurance" with a $10,000 deductible before anything was covered. We paid for all doctors and drugs last year out of pocket.
Health care is not a "human right", let alone enumerated as a function of the federal government. Repeal Jugearscare NOW.
|
|||||||
aid for by Tammy Baldwin for Senate
Reply:
Senator Baldwin,
Just
got your email about how the GOP is holding the Jugearscare "overhaul"
close to their chests - we don't know WHAT the bill will say!
Just
how is that different from Nancy Pee-Lousy's "We've got to pass it to
see what's in it!" that we heard before Jugearscare was enacted?
Hurts to be on the other end of things, doesn't it?
Chuck Kuecker
Beloit, WI.Chuck Kuecker
By the way - Jugearscare cost me and my wife over $13,000 last year, for "insurance" with a $10,000 deductible before anything was covered. We paid for all doctors and drugs last year out of pocket.
Health care is not a "human right", let alone enumerated as a function of the federal government. Repeal Jugearscare NOW.
Monday, July 10, 2017
Tammy Gay replies
I'm pretty sure my last email to her made it clear that "climate change" was one of my least concerns, what with bills in CONgress to deregulate silencers, repeal *and not replace) Jugearscare, and "draining the swamp"...
Dear Mr. Kuecker:
Dear Mr. Kuecker:
Thank
you
for
contacting
me
about
your
concerns
regarding
actions
to
address
climate
change.
I
appreciate
you
taking
the
time
to
write
to
me
about
this
important
issue.
I
believe
that
climate
change
is
a
serious
threat
to
the
natural
resources,
wildlife,
and
economic
drivers
of
Wisconsin
and
the
rest
of
the
world.
Because
of
the
massive
impact
climate
change
is
expected
to
have
on
our
economy
and
life
in
our
communities,
we
must
address
it.
I
will
continue
to
work
with
my
colleagues
to
find
bipartisan,
commonsense
solutions
that
address
the
causes
and
impacts
of
climate
change
at
the
state,
national
and
international
level.
We
have
a
strong
tradition
in
Wisconsin
of
taking
on
big
challenges.
Taking
on
and
planning
for
climate
change
can
help
us
build
a
strong,
resilient
economy
and
provide
a
more
secure
future
for
the
next
generations.
While
we
may
not
agree
on
every
issue,
your
input
helps
inform
the
work
I
do
in
the
United
States
Senate.
Once
again,
thank
you
for
contacting
my
office.
It
is
important
for
me
to
hear
from
the
people
of
Wisconsin
on
the
issues,
thoughts
and
concerns
that
matter
most
to
you.
If
I
can
be
of
further
assistance,
please
visit
my
website
at
www.baldwin.senate.gov
for
information
on
how
to
contact
my
office.
Tuesday, March 21, 2017
No surprise
Tammy Baldwin Paid Clinton Lawyer $90K For Crisis Control After VA Scandal
No one should be shocked at this. Tammy Gay has done exactly nothing for the people of Wisconsin except ruin lives.
Where does a politician get $90K to pay lawyers, anyway?
Sheriff Clarke is looking better every day. I wish I could buy one of his bobble heads...
Saturday, March 4, 2017
Letter to my senator
Tammy Gay Baldwin is under attack. She's been sending me emails frantically requesting funds to defend her Senate seat from Sheriff David Clarke of Milwaukee County.
Here's my response to her:
Dear Senator Baldwin,
I want to thank you for bringing the candidacy of Sheriff David Clarke to my attention via your solicitations for money. I will definitely be sending whatever I can to support his campaign to unseat you.
I care not what you do in your personal life, or who you have relationships with - it's none of my business, and believe me, most Wisconsinites couldn't care less about your sexuality - but you chose to make an issue of it. So don't get offended when Sheriff Clarke mentions what you have broadcast to all in his campaigning.
You could do some good for Wisconsin in your last months as a Senator. How about a bill to criminalize spoofing or misuse of Caller ID and email? We could put a bunch of the people now actively infringing on our Second Amendment rights in the FBI NICS office and the BAT(F)E to work hunting spammers and con artists rather than harassing gun owners and buyers.
Good luck in your life as a private citizen. I'm sure you can live comfortably on your Senate pension.
Regards,
Chuck Kuecker
Beloit, WI
Sheriff Clarke's web page: http://www.sheriffclarkeforsenate.com/donate/
Here's my response to her:
Dear Senator Baldwin,
I want to thank you for bringing the candidacy of Sheriff David Clarke to my attention via your solicitations for money. I will definitely be sending whatever I can to support his campaign to unseat you.
I care not what you do in your personal life, or who you have relationships with - it's none of my business, and believe me, most Wisconsinites couldn't care less about your sexuality - but you chose to make an issue of it. So don't get offended when Sheriff Clarke mentions what you have broadcast to all in his campaigning.
You could do some good for Wisconsin in your last months as a Senator. How about a bill to criminalize spoofing or misuse of Caller ID and email? We could put a bunch of the people now actively infringing on our Second Amendment rights in the FBI NICS office and the BAT(F)E to work hunting spammers and con artists rather than harassing gun owners and buyers.
Good luck in your life as a private citizen. I'm sure you can live comfortably on your Senate pension.
Regards,
Chuck Kuecker
Beloit, WI
Sheriff Clarke's web page: http://www.sheriffclarkeforsenate.com/donate/
Friday, December 6, 2013
Tammy Gay shows her true colors
A friend of mine recently contacted Tammy Gay about impeachment of our traitorous "President" Jugears Osama. Here's her reply:
Subject: A message from Senator Tammy Baldwin
From: Senator Tammy Baldwin
To: xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx
CC:
Subject: A message from Senator Tammy Baldwin
From: Senator Tammy Baldwin
To: xxxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx
CC:
|
Thank
you
for
contacting
regarding
your
support
to
impeach
and
remove
President
Obama
from
office.
Our
nation's
founders
created
a
system
of
checks
and
balances,
providing
for
congressional
oversight as a
fundamental
part
of
ensuring
co-equal
branches
of
government.
I
took
an
oath
of
office
to
uphold
the
Constitution.
I
take
that
sacred
pledge
very
seriously.
The
president
and
vice
president
of
the
United
States
also
take
an
oath
of
office,
swearing
to
"...preserve,
protect
and
defend
the
Constitution
of
the
United
States."
This
commitment
and
obligation
is
so
fundamental
to
our
democracy
that
our
nation's
founders
proscribed
that
oath
in
our
Constitution.
Article
II,
Section
4
of
our
Constitution
clearly
delineates
that
the
removal
of
the
president
and
vice
president
for,
is
for
among
other
things,
"high
crimes
and
misdemeanors."
Impeachment
is
the
ultimate
power
that
Congress
has
to
prevent
and
punish
abuse
of
power
from
the
Executive
and
Judicial
branches.
President
Obama
and
Vice-President
Biden
in
no
way
qualify
for
the
strict
provisions
detailed
in
our
Constitution
for
impeachment.
It
is
important
that
the
integrity
of
our
checks
and
balances
remain
in
place
through
the
careful
use
of
the
constitutional
powers
given
to
each
branch
of
government.
I
do
not
believe
in
using
the
ultimate
power
that
Congress
has
to
check
the
Executive
and
Judicial
Branches
for
partisan
ends.
Please
be
assured
that
I
will
continue
to
protect
the
constitutional
prerogatives
of
Congress
and
guard
against
excess
power
from
any
branch.
Sincerely, Tammy Baldwin United States Senator :I took an oath of office to uphold the Constitution. I take that sacred pledge very seriously."One wonders which Constitution she is referring to. She has certainly voted for enough un-Constitutional legislation in her time in the House and as a senator. "President Obama and Vice-President Biden in no way qualify for the strict provisions detailed in our Constitution for impeachment."Bowing down to foreign princes and kissing their hands? Giving material aid in the form of tax money stolen from US citizens to our country's sworn enemies? Intentionally violating the laws he himself signed? Directly attacking the Bill of Rights - especially advocating direct violations of the Second Amendment? Biden might not have done anything actionable - being an idiot and a tame parrot isn't a high crime or misdememanor.. |
Monday, August 5, 2013
Insanity
Lest anyone think Tammy Gay Baldwin has our best interests at heart, the AP just reported that she is pushing a bill to eliminate the ban on gay men donating blood. It's "discriminatory".
That ban is there for a good reason - the overwhelming majority of AIDS cases can be traced to male homosexual interactions.
If she wants to put the whole population at risk of blood borne diseases, what else might she be planning?
Besides, one hallmark of a mature human adult is the ability to discriminate between good and bad. How did that word ever get a bad connotation?
That ban is there for a good reason - the overwhelming majority of AIDS cases can be traced to male homosexual interactions.
If she wants to put the whole population at risk of blood borne diseases, what else might she be planning?
Besides, one hallmark of a mature human adult is the ability to discriminate between good and bad. How did that word ever get a bad connotation?
Saturday, April 13, 2013
Reply from Tammy Gay
I've sent emails and letters telling this person "NO more gun control", and have included the Einstein quote about insanity more than once.
Color me surprised at her reply. He's in favor of universal checks, magazine and "assault weapon" bans, and "more research".
++++++++++++++++++++
Once
again,
thank
you
for
contacting
my
office.
It
is
important
for
me
to
hear
from
the
people
of
Wisconsin
on
the
issues,
thoughts
and
concerns
that
matter
most
to
you.
If
I
can
be
of
further
assistance,
please
visit
my
website
at
www.baldwin.senate.gov
for
information
on
how
to
contact
my
office.
Sincerely,
Tammy Baldwin
United States Senator
++++++++++++++++++++
I am sure her definition of "gun safety" does not include the Four Rules. It sure won't involve Eddie Eagle or teaching gun safety in grade school.
Color me surprised at her reply. He's in favor of universal checks, magazine and "assault weapon" bans, and "more research".
++++++++++++++++++++
Thank
you
for
contacting
me
about
federal
gun
policy.
I
value
your
input
on
a
topic
that
involves
fundamental
constitutional
rights
and
the
safety
of
our
families
and
communities.
The
horrific
tragedy
at
Sandy
Hook
elementary
school
in
Newtown,
Connecticut
in
December
of
last
year
has
prompted
a
national
dialogue
on
guns
and
federal
gun
policy.
Other
mass
killings
at
Fort
Hood
in
Texas;
at
a
grocery
store
in
Tucson,
Arizona;
at
a
movie
theater
in
Aurora,
Colorado;
and
in
a
place
of
worship
in
Oak
Creek,
Wisconsin
have
heightened
our
focus
on
strategies
to
reduce
gun
violence
and
save
lives.
But,
the
death
of
20
young
school
children
and
six
teachers
at
Sandy
Hook
demands
that
we
try
to
find
common
ground
to
take
action
without
violating
constitutional
rights.
A
wide
range
of
policy
options
have
been
put
forth
as
a
part
of
this
conversation.
In
January,
President
Obama
outlined
his
plan
to
reduce
gun
violence
in
the
United
States.
Additionally,
several
bills
relating
to
gun
violence
have
been
offered
in
both
Houses
of
Congress
and
Congressional
Committees
are
holding
Hearings
to
inform
the
path
forward.
In
addition
to
hearing
from
you,
it
has
been
important
to
me
to
listen
to
Wisconsinites
with
various
perspectives
on
the
issue.
To
date,
I
have
met
with
Chiefs
of
Police
from
a
number
of
communities,
family
members
of
the
fallen
at
Oak
Creek,
sportsmen
and
women,
and
researchers
seeking
to
better
understand
what
policies
can
be
effective
as
we
seek
to
reduce
gun
injury
and
death.
I
look
forward
to
gaining
additional
insight
as
we
continue
the
work
on
solutions
to
prevent
gun
violence.
Debates
over
gun
policies
often
evoke
strong
responses
because
throughout
our
policymaking,
we
must
safeguard
constitutional
rights
at
the
same
time
as
we
endeavor
to
safeguard
communities
and
combat
crime.
I
am
a
gun
owner
and
firmly
believe
in
the
Second
Amendment
and
the
right
of
law-abiding
Americans
to
keep
and
bear
arms.
I
also
believe
that,
as
the
Supreme
Court
has
ruled,
this
right
can
be
reconciled
with
reasonable,
common
sense
safety
measures.
Ever
since
passage
of
the
Brady
Act
in
1993,
federal
law
has
required
criminal
background
checks
for
certain
gun
purchases.
In
the
20
years
since
the
passage
of
the
Brady
Act
and
with
the
advent
and
widespread
use
of
e-commerce,
an
increasing
number
of
gun
sales
occur
without
a
criminal
background
check.
I
support
requiring
background
checks
on
all
gun
sales.
In
addition,
I
support
giving
law
enforcement
additional
tools
to
crack
down
on
gun
trafficking
and
the
straw
purchasers
who
help
get
guns
into
the
hands
of
criminals.
The
recent
tragedies
across
the
nation
also
give
us
reason
to
reassess
our
mental
health
system.
Most
people
with
mental
illness
will
never
become
violent.
However,
if
mental
health
treatment
and
services
were
more
readily
available,
we
would
see
fewer
people
in
situations
that
spiral
out
of
control.
I
believe
that
we
should
have
a
special
emphasis
on
young
adults,
as
most
mental
illnesses
manifest
themselves
by
the
time
a
person
reaches
young
adulthood.
I
have
previously
worked
to
ensure
mental
health
parity,
so
that
insurance
policies
cover
mental
illness
in
the
same
way
that
they
cover
physical
illness.
While
mental
health
parity
is
now
the
law,
it
has
not
been
fully
implemented
and
its
benefits
are
not
felt
by
those
Americans
who
lack
insurance
coverage.
I
support
the
President's
call
to
restore
research
funding
that
can
help
us
study
gun
violence,
gun
injury
prevention
and
gun
safety.
Limits
have
been
placed
on
such
funding
by
Congress
for
a
number
of
years,
and
it
is
high
time
those
restrictions
be
lifted.
Accurate
data
and
careful,
objective
evaluation
of
that
data
informs
better
policy.
The
President's
plan
to
reduce
gun
violence
in
the
United
States
makes
a
series
of
recommendations
that
include
instituting
a
ban
on
assault
weapons
and
high
capacity
magazines.
Each
of
these
proposals
will
get
careful
scrutiny.
Every
year
in
Wisconsin,
hundreds
of
thousands
of
Wisconsinites
go
hunting.
It
is
a
time-honored
tradition
that
is
a
part
of
our
state's
culture.
We
must
assure
that
these
proposals
do
nothing
to
inhibit
the
celebrated
sporting
heritage
of
our
state.
I
look
forward
to
reviewing
these
proposals
and
working
with
my
colleagues
to
find
common
ground,
so
that
we
can
reduce
gun
violence
in
this
country
while
protecting
everyone's
Second
Amendment
rights.
+++
Please
know
that
I
will
keep
your
thoughts
and
suggestions
in
mind
as
Congress
considers
gun
policy
legislation.
Sincerely,
Tammy Baldwin
United States Senator
++++++++++++++++++++
I am sure her definition of "gun safety" does not include the Four Rules. It sure won't involve Eddie Eagle or teaching gun safety in grade school.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Emails to senators
To Ron Johnson:
As one of your constituents, I want you to stand firm and oppose ANY new legislation concerning "gun violence" or further infringing on our God-given, Second Amendment ensured right to keep and bear arms.
"Universal background checks" will do nothing except lead to "universal registration", which inevitably leads to universal confiscation and genocide. History is clear on this.
No new gun laws. Perhaps we could try enforcing a few of the existing ones - like the magazine ban a TV reporter violated in Washington DC recently, or the blatant attempt at a "straw purchase" by Gabby Gifford's husband.
I'm counting on you to negate the vote your colleague Tammy will no doubt give, to destroy our freedom insurance once and for all.
To Tammy Gay Baldwin:
As one of the people you took an oath to support and defend the Constitution for, I want you to vote NO on each and every new proposal to further infringe on our God-given and Second Amendment ensured right to self-defense and freedom's tools.
"Universal background checks" will do nothing to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons, but will be completely unenforceable unless accompanied by "universal registration". Of course, criminals will ignore that too, but now there's a nice neat list of all those law-abiding folks who own guns, and which guns they own.
As happened in California, that list WILL be used when the next "scary gun of the week" ban comes along, to confiscate those scary registered weapons. Or, it will be leaked to the press to enable burglars to know exactly which houses to target to obtain weapons without worrying about the other laws enacted to prevent this.
Once the lists are made, it is simple for a future administration to go get those guns - to "keep us safe".
History - you know, that inconvenient truth that keeps proving socialist ideas don't work - tells us that once such lists are made, they WILL be used, and then the people are ripe for the concentration camp and the gas chamber.
Please remember what certain governments in the last 100 years did to people who were seen as different or deviant - and then think of what you will do when your neighbors and friends are all disarmed and sadly watch as you are herded into a box car or a truck with airtight doors.
It has happened. It will happen again if we are stupid enough to lay the foundations for a new Holocaust.
Do NOT be that stupid person. You work for me and the rest of Wisconsin - not for the new world order or George Soros.
No new gun laws. NONE.
We have spoken. Ignore us at the risk of your next election.
As one of your constituents, I want you to stand firm and oppose ANY new legislation concerning "gun violence" or further infringing on our God-given, Second Amendment ensured right to keep and bear arms.
"Universal background checks" will do nothing except lead to "universal registration", which inevitably leads to universal confiscation and genocide. History is clear on this.
No new gun laws. Perhaps we could try enforcing a few of the existing ones - like the magazine ban a TV reporter violated in Washington DC recently, or the blatant attempt at a "straw purchase" by Gabby Gifford's husband.
I'm counting on you to negate the vote your colleague Tammy will no doubt give, to destroy our freedom insurance once and for all.
To Tammy Gay Baldwin:
As one of the people you took an oath to support and defend the Constitution for, I want you to vote NO on each and every new proposal to further infringe on our God-given and Second Amendment ensured right to self-defense and freedom's tools.
"Universal background checks" will do nothing to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons, but will be completely unenforceable unless accompanied by "universal registration". Of course, criminals will ignore that too, but now there's a nice neat list of all those law-abiding folks who own guns, and which guns they own.
As happened in California, that list WILL be used when the next "scary gun of the week" ban comes along, to confiscate those scary registered weapons. Or, it will be leaked to the press to enable burglars to know exactly which houses to target to obtain weapons without worrying about the other laws enacted to prevent this.
Once the lists are made, it is simple for a future administration to go get those guns - to "keep us safe".
History - you know, that inconvenient truth that keeps proving socialist ideas don't work - tells us that once such lists are made, they WILL be used, and then the people are ripe for the concentration camp and the gas chamber.
Please remember what certain governments in the last 100 years did to people who were seen as different or deviant - and then think of what you will do when your neighbors and friends are all disarmed and sadly watch as you are herded into a box car or a truck with airtight doors.
It has happened. It will happen again if we are stupid enough to lay the foundations for a new Holocaust.
Do NOT be that stupid person. You work for me and the rest of Wisconsin - not for the new world order or George Soros.
No new gun laws. NONE.
We have spoken. Ignore us at the risk of your next election.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Letter to Ron Johnson
This just went out to Senator Johnson at his contact site:
I just want to remind you that many Wisconsinites are depending on you to vote NO on each and every new gun regulation that may arise while you are our Senator.
There can be no bipartisanship when human rights are involved. Something is either wrong or right - there is no room for compromise.
Our Constitution states that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, in the sense that Americans are to be allowed unfettered access to modern military weapons for their own personal defense and for the defense of freedom.
Regulating gun transfers, cosmetic features, makes and models, or considering "sporting uses" goes against the Second Amendment and the inalienable rights of Americans - indeed, of every human being.
I have already contacted Senator Baldwin in this matter, and hope that you can at least negate her 'aye' vote on new gun controls and infringements if she does not do her duty to the people of Wisconsin.
I just want to remind you that many Wisconsinites are depending on you to vote NO on each and every new gun regulation that may arise while you are our Senator.
There can be no bipartisanship when human rights are involved. Something is either wrong or right - there is no room for compromise.
Our Constitution states that the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, in the sense that Americans are to be allowed unfettered access to modern military weapons for their own personal defense and for the defense of freedom.
Regulating gun transfers, cosmetic features, makes and models, or considering "sporting uses" goes against the Second Amendment and the inalienable rights of Americans - indeed, of every human being.
I have already contacted Senator Baldwin in this matter, and hope that you can at least negate her 'aye' vote on new gun controls and infringements if she does not do her duty to the people of Wisconsin.
Letter to Tammy Gay
Sent this via her "contact me" web site this morning:
++++++++++++++++++++++
Please be aware that a large number of Wisconsinites believe that the Second Amendment means what it says - in plain language, that the federal government shall make no law that in any way interferes with the American people's access to modern military small arms and ammunition.
This means no registration. No limits on "ammunition feeding devices". No bans on certain weapons because of magazine capacity or "scary" detail features. No new regulations on firearms whatsoever.
This means we want you to work actively for the repeal of as many of the thousands of blatantly un-Constitutional gun laws already on the federal books as you can. Laws like the Brady Bill which requires Americans to get permission from the FBI before purchasing freedom's tools. Laws like the 1934 National Firearms Act, which taxes certain firearms. No other inalienable human right is taxed in America except this - arguably the most important of all. Laws like the 1968 Gun Control Act, with sections plagiarized from the German gun control laws of the 1920s. Laws like the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act, amended at the last moment to further restrict American's access to modern military small arms.
This means acting to investigate the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, to determine if criminal charges are warranted in the matter of "Fast and Furious".
This means acting to reject any attempts to ratify a treaty with the United Nations in any way affecting Americans access to small arms.
In short, it means that we want you to honor the oath you swore on taking office to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Read your history. Every genocide in modern history was preceded by "gun control" in the form of registration and eventual confiscation. Remember that Nazi Germany included gay people among those rounded up after they were rendered defenseless. If you vote to enact any of these laws, you will be complicit in any future atrocity where a defenseless American people are slaughtered.
Remember that you serve at the pleasure of the people of Wisconsin, and that there is an election coming up in 2018 - and we WILL remember how you voted in these matters.
++++++++++++++++++++++
Probably a waste of time...
++++++++++++++++++++++
Please be aware that a large number of Wisconsinites believe that the Second Amendment means what it says - in plain language, that the federal government shall make no law that in any way interferes with the American people's access to modern military small arms and ammunition.
This means no registration. No limits on "ammunition feeding devices". No bans on certain weapons because of magazine capacity or "scary" detail features. No new regulations on firearms whatsoever.
This means we want you to work actively for the repeal of as many of the thousands of blatantly un-Constitutional gun laws already on the federal books as you can. Laws like the Brady Bill which requires Americans to get permission from the FBI before purchasing freedom's tools. Laws like the 1934 National Firearms Act, which taxes certain firearms. No other inalienable human right is taxed in America except this - arguably the most important of all. Laws like the 1968 Gun Control Act, with sections plagiarized from the German gun control laws of the 1920s. Laws like the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act, amended at the last moment to further restrict American's access to modern military small arms.
This means acting to investigate the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, to determine if criminal charges are warranted in the matter of "Fast and Furious".
This means acting to reject any attempts to ratify a treaty with the United Nations in any way affecting Americans access to small arms.
In short, it means that we want you to honor the oath you swore on taking office to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Read your history. Every genocide in modern history was preceded by "gun control" in the form of registration and eventual confiscation. Remember that Nazi Germany included gay people among those rounded up after they were rendered defenseless. If you vote to enact any of these laws, you will be complicit in any future atrocity where a defenseless American people are slaughtered.
Remember that you serve at the pleasure of the people of Wisconsin, and that there is an election coming up in 2018 - and we WILL remember how you voted in these matters.
++++++++++++++++++++++
Probably a waste of time...
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Constitutional wishful thinking
Just woke up with this in my head...shamelessly stolen from here.
I posted his original "act" here.
++++++++++++++++++
SEC. 7. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
This Act will be offered as a federal Constitutional Amendment, once and for all time removing the power of the Federal Government and Congress and the legislatures of the various States from ever again meddling in the day-to-day lives of the citizens of the United States of America without explicit authorization under their several Constitutions.
I posted his original "act" here.
++++++++++++++++++
Individual Infringement Reform Act
113th Congress
1st Session
S. ____
1st Session
S. ____
To propose a Constitutional amendment to remedy various federal infringements on individual and states rights in existing federal law.
IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE
January 25, 2013
January 25, 2013
Mr. (Ms.?) XXXX of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Judiciary Committee.
A BILL
To retroactively repeal certain unconstitutional legislation concerning individual citizens, and prohibit state infringement of their right to be free of un-Constitutional laws affecting individuals.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the 'Individual Freedom Infringement Reform Act of 2013'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND AUTHORITY.
1. The Congress finds that certain provisions of United States Statutes concerning individuals, including the National Firearms Act of 1934 and all subsequent federal law, the Social Security Act of 1935, and every other Act passed by Congress that has no explicit authorization in the United States Constitution, and various amendments and additions to those acts, to be and to have been unconstitutional, from inception, and may be repealed in accordance with United States Constitution Article I Section 1.
2. The Congress finds that certain state actors have been infringing on individual rights through statutes passed without explicit authorization of those States' Constitutions, and that it may legislate to prevent such infringement under the Amendment to the United States Constitution proposed June 13, 1866, known as the Fourteenth Amendment.
2. The Congress finds that certain state actors have been infringing on individual rights through statutes passed without explicit authorization of those States' Constitutions, and that it may legislate to prevent such infringement under the Amendment to the United States Constitution proposed June 13, 1866, known as the Fourteenth Amendment.
SEC. 3. REPEALS.
The following statutes or amendments are hereby repealed retroactively to their respective dates of enactment:
1. National Firearms Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 1236, as encoded in 26 USC ch. 53, and elsewhere.
2. Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, Pub.L. 90-351, 82 Stat. 197, as encoded in 42 U.S.C. § 3711, and elsewhere.
3. Gun Control of 1968, Pub.L. 90-618, 82 Stat. 1213, as encoded in 18 USC ch. 44, and elsewhere.
4. Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986, Pub.L. 99-308, 100 Stat. 449, as encoded in 18 U.S.C. § 921 et seq., and elsewhere.
5. Brady Handgun Violation Prevention Act of 1993, Pub.L. 103-159, 107 Stat. 1536, as encoded in 18 USC 921-922, and elsewhere.
6. Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban of 1996, Pub.L. 104-208 as encoded in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), and elsewhere.
7. Social Security Act of 1935, as encoded in Pub.L. 74-271, 49;Stat.;620, 42 U.S.C.;ch.7; and elsewhere.
A very LONG list...
I wonder if there's a legal means to do this without enumerating every one of the millions of federal rules enacted since Lincoln...
A very LONG list...
I wonder if there's a legal means to do this without enumerating every one of the millions of federal rules enacted since Lincoln...
SEC. 4. STATE INFRINGEMENTS.
This section shall apply to any official, agent, employee, contractor, or other individual acting at the instigation, direction, or request of such, whether of the United States, a State, United States Territory, or a local authority within a state or territory.
1. No such covered individual shall infringe, impede, tax, or burden the rights of any individual without an explicit clause in the individual's State Constitution.
2. Any individual who has had his right infringed under this section shall have standing for exoneration under any criminal charges, and for a claim of damages and return of property that may have been seized and forfeited, together with costs and attorney fees, or one terajoule of energy, whichever is greater, for each offense.
Is a mere terajoule sufficient? This is only 278,000 kWh, or roughly ten year's electricity usage. This is a gross offense on individual liberty - let's make it ten petajoules!
1. No such covered individual shall infringe, impede, tax, or burden the rights of any individual without an explicit clause in the individual's State Constitution.
2. Any individual who has had his right infringed under this section shall have standing for exoneration under any criminal charges, and for a claim of damages and return of property that may have been seized and forfeited, together with costs and attorney fees, or one terajoule of energy, whichever is greater, for each offense.
Is a mere terajoule sufficient? This is only 278,000 kWh, or roughly ten year's electricity usage. This is a gross offense on individual liberty - let's make it ten petajoules!
On second thought - where is this compensation coming from? The federal government has no money, except what is stolen from the citizens...
SEC. 5. REMEDIATION.
(a) CONVICTIONS TO BE SET ASIDE — Any individual convicted under any of the above repealed provisions shall be entitled to have his or her convictions set aside, including any continuing disabilities removed, except as provided below in Sec. 6, upon application therefor to any United States Court of competent jurisdiction.
(b) COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION — Any individual convicted under any of the above repealed provisions shall be entitled to receive compensation at established rates for wrongful conviction, including any attorney fees and court costs.
(b) COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION — Any individual convicted under any of the above repealed provisions shall be entitled to receive compensation at established rates for wrongful conviction, including any attorney fees and court costs.
SEC. 6. EXCEPTION FOR DISABILITY REMOVAL.
Removal of a disability to any individual's rights is not required under this Act if any of the following conditions have been met:
(a) The disability was imposed by a court of competent jurisdiction for actions committed on a territory for which Congress has exclusive legislative jurisdiction under United States Constitution Article I Section 8 Clause 17 and Article IV Section 3 Clause 2; and either
(1) It was imposed as part of the sentencing order upon conviction of the defendant for an act committed on that territory and as prescribed in the statute under which he or she was convicted; or
(2) It was imposed upon unanimous verdict of a jury of twelve on proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant poses a clear and present danger to others if the right is not disabled.
If an individual is a danger to others unless he or she obeys a law, why are they loose in society anyway? Criminals do not obey laws - definition! SEC. 7. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
This Act will be offered as a federal Constitutional Amendment, once and for all time removing the power of the Federal Government and Congress and the legislatures of the various States from ever again meddling in the day-to-day lives of the citizens of the United States of America without explicit authorization under their several Constitutions.
END.
++++++++++++++++++
Beautiful dreamer...
Now - which candidate for Senator in Wisconsin is most likely to propose a bill like this?
Certainly not Tammy Gay Baldwin...
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Tammy Gay on Fast and Furious
The soon-to-be-unemployed (pray!) representative from Wisconsin tells us all about the scandal:
+++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++
Interesting. She actually seems like she's uncomfortable with how things are going, though she seems more interested in financial waste than probable acts of domestic terrorism that likely include the White House and maybe the Secretary of State.
It's good to know about the mail being irradiated. I'm sure that Al Qaeda will take that into account before mailing anything nasty to CONgress...
+++++++++++++++++++
 | ||
October 13, 2011 Mr. Charles Kuecker ***************** Beloit, Wisconsin 53511 Dear Mr. Kuecker: Thank you for contacting me about the Fast and Furious sting operation. It is good to hear from you and I apologize for the delay in my response. As you know, the Fast and Furious sting operation was a gun-trafficking network that attempted to trace firearms in order to follow the flow of weapons in Mexican drug cartels. The Fast and Furious sting was run out of the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, Tobacco, and Explosives, a federal law enforcement program within the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The ATF's aim was to use the information to prosecute, disarm, and break the cartels. However, weapons from the Fast and Furious operation were found at multiple violent crime scenes in Mexico, and as a result, the entire program came under intense scrutiny from Congress, the media, and the American public. As you may know, Representative Darrell Issa, chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, called for a Congressional investigation into the Fast and Furious operation. Rep. Issa claims Attorney General Eric Holder deliberately misled Congress about when he was aware that the operation was in action. Attorney General Holder testified before the House Committee that his office receives over a hundred pages of summaries in a weekly report, and while addressed to him, many are reviewed by members of his staff. Holder received a subpoena for D.O.J. documents related to the operation, and the process of Congressional review is ongoing. Like you, I believe that there needs to be increased accountability and transparency within the federal government. During a time when the American people are increasingly distrusting of the government, it is more important than ever for Congress to combat ineffective programs and improve responsible governance. Rest assured I will keep your thoughts in mind as the authorization and management of the Fast and Furious operation is investigated by Congress. Again, thank you for sharing your views. Your opinion matters to me. If I can be of service to you in any other way, please do not hesitate to let me know. As a security precaution, all mail sent to Congress is first irradiated. This process causes significant delays. To ensure the fastest response, I encourage all constituents who have access to the internet to contact me through my website at http://tammybaldwin.house.gov. Sincerely,  Tammy Baldwin Member of Congress |
Interesting. She actually seems like she's uncomfortable with how things are going, though she seems more interested in financial waste than probable acts of domestic terrorism that likely include the White House and maybe the Secretary of State.
It's good to know about the mail being irradiated. I'm sure that Al Qaeda will take that into account before mailing anything nasty to CONgress...
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Emila to Tammy Gay
Just saw where she voted against repealing the totally idiotic requirement for businesses to issue 1099 forms for every transaction over $600.
Sent her another (useless) email:
Tammy,
WHAT ARE YOU DOING? Our state is drowning in debt - hundreds of thousands are unemployed.
And you vote to retain a rule that will saddle small businesses with literally tons of paperwork, not to mention costing the IRS another ton of money to process it.
You were elected to serve the people of Southern Wisconsin. Looks to me like you've switched to the Dark Side!
2012 is coming, and we remember. Try and remember that fact yourself.
Sent her another (useless) email:
Tammy,
WHAT ARE YOU DOING? Our state is drowning in debt - hundreds of thousands are unemployed.
And you vote to retain a rule that will saddle small businesses with literally tons of paperwork, not to mention costing the IRS another ton of money to process it.
You were elected to serve the people of Southern Wisconsin. Looks to me like you've switched to the Dark Side!
2012 is coming, and we remember. Try and remember that fact yourself.
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
HR 12 email to Tammy Gay
Just sent her this. Her email web page has changed, so I had to re-enter everything Firefox normally pre-fills for me.
++++++++++++++++
Re: HR 1, Continuing Resolution
I want you to support this. We need to cut federal programs back to those authorized by the Constitution, no matter how painful this might be.
The federal budget must balance every year. No more deficit spending for anything!
Federal expenditures must be limited to a small percentage of the actual Gross National Product. 10% is more than adequate to fund what the Constitution authorizes.
++++++++++++++++
Re: HR 1, Continuing Resolution
I want you to support this. We need to cut federal programs back to those authorized by the Constitution, no matter how painful this might be.
The federal budget must balance every year. No more deficit spending for anything!
Federal expenditures must be limited to a small percentage of the actual Gross National Product. 10% is more than adequate to fund what the Constitution authorizes.
Thursday, February 10, 2011
Another one to Tammy Gay
HR 140, the Birthright Citizenship bill, that would codify the status of persons actually subject to the laws of the US, rather than the accident of being birthed here, is coming up for a vote.
Probably Osama would veto this, as it would remove a lot of his illegal electorate, but it's a statement that's needed.
Sent Tammy Gay this:
I want you to sponsor H.R. 140, the "Birthright Citizenship" bill. It is long past time for our country to start treating non-citizens the same way as our neighbor, Mexico, does, and as all other civilized countries on Earth do.
Remember, 2012 is coming, and we are watching you.
Probably Osama would veto this, as it would remove a lot of his illegal electorate, but it's a statement that's needed.
Sent Tammy Gay this:
I want you to sponsor H.R. 140, the "Birthright Citizenship" bill. It is long past time for our country to start treating non-citizens the same way as our neighbor, Mexico, does, and as all other civilized countries on Earth do.
Remember, 2012 is coming, and we are watching you.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Email from Tammy Gay
Just got this:
February 3, 2011
Sincerely,
Tammy Baldwin
Member of Congress
P.S. I regularly send out email updates on federal issues and opportunities. These reports also include regular surveys through which you can express your opinion. If you would like to receive these email updates, you may sign up by visiting my website at: http://baldwin.congressnewsletter.net/mail/util.cfm?mailaction=profile
+++++++++++++++++++++++
The only probelm is - this is in response to an email I sent her ordering her to follow the instructions given by her employers...and to vote to repeal OsamaCare...
February 3, 2011
Mr. Chuck Kuecker
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Beloit, Wisconsin 53511
Dear Mr. Kuecker:
Thank you for contacting me about the health care reform law. It is good to hear from you.
As you know, in March 2010, President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law. The measure marks an important step toward providing quality, affordable health care for all Americans.
We already have seen important benefits of the law go into effect. Insurance companies can no longer discriminate against children based on pre-existing medical conditions, young adults now can stay on their parents' insurance plans up to age 26, and seniors have received relief in their prescription drug costs.
Over the coming years, the law will provide health insurance coverage to millions more Americans. It also will fill the Medicare prescription drug donut hole, offer tax credits to small businesses and individuals to purchase insurance, and prevent insurance companies from issuing caps on coverage or discriminating against any American based on pre-existing medical conditions, health status, or gender.
Unfortunately, the new Republican majority in the House of Representatives made repealing this important law their first order of business -- rather than focusing on creating jobs. On January 19, 2011, the new majority voted to repeal the health care law over my strong opposition. Under the repeal plan, 147,000 young adults in Wisconsin would stand to lose their insurance coverage through their parents' health care plan; 46,000 Wisconsin seniors would face higher costs for prescription drugs; and, once again, people would be discriminated against because of pre-existing conditions.
On February 2, 2011, the Senate voted against repealing the health care law. It is possible that the Senate will continue to take votes to repeal the health care law. However, should the measure pass the Senate, President Obama has stated that he will veto it. Please know that I will continue to oppose attempts to weaken or repeal the health care reform law.
Again, thank you for sharing your views. Your opinion matters to me. If I can be of service to you in any other way, please do not hesitate to let me know. As a security precaution, all mail sent to Congress is first irradiated. This process causes significant delays. To ensure the fastest response, I encourage all constituents who have access to the internet to contact me through my website at http://tammybaldwin.house.gov.
Sincerely,
Tammy Baldwin
Member of Congress
P.S. I regularly send out email updates on federal issues and opportunities. These reports also include regular surveys through which you can express your opinion. If you would like to receive these email updates, you may sign up by visiting my website at: http://baldwin.congressnewsletter.net/mail/util.cfm?mailaction=profile
The only probelm is - this is in response to an email I sent her ordering her to follow the instructions given by her employers...and to vote to repeal OsamaCare...
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Email to Tammy Gay
Just felt like it:
++++++++++++++++++
I just wanted to let you know that I, and a large majority of your constituents, want you to vote NO on any new gun control laws that may be introduced. Under no circumstances are you to introduce or sponsor any such infringements on our Constitutional rights.
You may have "dodged the bullet" in the last election, but be assured, we in Rock County are making sure of our "target" the next time you come up for election. If you wish to continue as our employee and representative, you will start voting against the following:
Tax increases
New bureaucracies
Expansion of power of existing bureaucracies
"Feel good" laws of any sort
Laws intended to "make us (feel) safe"
Any law not firmly based on existing Constitutional powers of the federal government
Any law based on the flawed interpretation of the Commerce Clause
Do this, and I might vote for you next time. Otherwise, remember - we are watching you, and we have long memories.
By the way - I put "quotation marks" around the "inflammatory" phrases above, in case someone attempts to do the TJIC thing to me. Why don't you look into why the State of Massachusetts broke the First Amendment with this person?
Website: http://tjic.com/ - shut down by the MA police, evidently, for saying something they didn't like.
++++++++++++++++++
I just wanted to let you know that I, and a large majority of your constituents, want you to vote NO on any new gun control laws that may be introduced. Under no circumstances are you to introduce or sponsor any such infringements on our Constitutional rights.
You may have "dodged the bullet" in the last election, but be assured, we in Rock County are making sure of our "target" the next time you come up for election. If you wish to continue as our employee and representative, you will start voting against the following:
Tax increases
New bureaucracies
Expansion of power of existing bureaucracies
"Feel good" laws of any sort
Laws intended to "make us (feel) safe"
Any law not firmly based on existing Constitutional powers of the federal government
Any law based on the flawed interpretation of the Commerce Clause
Do this, and I might vote for you next time. Otherwise, remember - we are watching you, and we have long memories.
By the way - I put "quotation marks" around the "inflammatory" phrases above, in case someone attempts to do the TJIC thing to me. Why don't you look into why the State of Massachusetts broke the First Amendment with this person?
Website: http://tjic.com/ - shut down by the MA police, evidently, for saying something they didn't like.
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Tammy Gay gets another chance to prove her worth
So, Tammy Gay got re-elected - probably because of all the union workers in her district that would vote Demonrat even if the Demonrats just emasculated them.
So, another email to her:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Congratulations on your re-election.
Now, down to business. I hope you realize that you are employed "at will" by the people you represent, and that you are there to do our bidding.
Our bidding is that you vote NO on any new legislation involving any new federal bureaucracy, and new federal taxes, or any new federal regulations that in any way impact American business or the economy.
No more bailouts. No more "stimulus".
We want a balance budget, and reduced federal spending. Getting rid of earmarks and the like is all well and good, but what we want is for you to start dismantling all the alphabet-soup agencies that have no basis in Constitutional law, that are currently sucking the lifeblood out of our society.
I will be contacting you periodically to remind you of these facts. Remember - you work for US - you don't tell US how to live.
Thanks.
Chuck Kuecker
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FWIW, the 'capcha' on her email site: "murder, Adaymer"...
So, another email to her:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Congratulations on your re-election.
Now, down to business. I hope you realize that you are employed "at will" by the people you represent, and that you are there to do our bidding.
Our bidding is that you vote NO on any new legislation involving any new federal bureaucracy, and new federal taxes, or any new federal regulations that in any way impact American business or the economy.
No more bailouts. No more "stimulus".
We want a balance budget, and reduced federal spending. Getting rid of earmarks and the like is all well and good, but what we want is for you to start dismantling all the alphabet-soup agencies that have no basis in Constitutional law, that are currently sucking the lifeblood out of our society.
I will be contacting you periodically to remind you of these facts. Remember - you work for US - you don't tell US how to live.
Thanks.
Chuck Kuecker
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FWIW, the 'capcha' on her email site: "murder, Adaymer"...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)